How do different track shapes affect the travel time of a mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jan2905
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores how different track shapes—down-facing parabola (P1), straight (P2), and up-facing parabola (P3)—affect the travel time of a mass projected with the same initial horizontal velocity. It is suggested that the travel time for the straight track (t2) is less than that for the parabolic tracks (t1 and t3), which are equal due to their identical lengths. The conversation also raises questions about the mass's ability to navigate the parabolic tracks with a horizontal velocity and the implications of conservation of energy on its speed at point B. Concerns about the problem's formulation are noted, with a suggestion to consider a cycloid as an alternative track shape. The discussion highlights the relationship between track geometry and motion dynamics in physics.
jan2905
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
You will have to use your imagination: 3 tracks are constructed as such... path 1 (P1) is similar to a "down-facing parabola," path 2 (P2) is straight, and path 3 (P3) is similar to an "up-facing parabola." P1 is "uphill," P2 is "through that hill," and P3 "under the hill, beneath P2, and exactly 'oposite' of P1."

Okay! ... A mass m starting at point A (foot of the hill) is projected with the same initial horizontal velocity v along each of the three tracks (negligible friction) sufficient in each case to allow the mass to reach the end of the track at point B (oposite foot of the hill). The masses remain in contact with the tracks throughout their motions. The displacement A-B is the same in each case, and the total path length of P1 and P3 are the equal. If t1, t2, and t3 are the total travel times between A and B for P1, P2, and P3 respetively, what is the relation among these times?



I said intuitively that: t2<t1=t3. correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jan2905 said:
Okay! ... A mass m starting at point A (foot of the hill) is projected with the same initial horizontal velocity v along each of the three tracks (negligible friction) sufficient in each case to allow the mass to reach the end of the track at point B (opposite foot of the hill).
I said intuitively that: t2<t1=t3. correct?

What a nice little problem! Keeping in mind that the initial velocity is horizontal... Consider parabola (1) Will a horizontal velocity enable the mass to slide up over the hill? (If so, will it for ALL parabolas?) Consider parabola (2) The horizontal velocity will enable the mass to slide down the track. With no friction, what does conservation of energy tell you about the velocity of the mass when it reached point B? Finally, what is the relationship between the lengths of the straight line track and the parabolic track.

(As you may deduce from my comments, I have some qualms about the formulation of the problem, but it's still a nice problem. Substitute a cycloid for the parabola and tweak it a little and you have a classic physics problem...)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top