How Do Distinct Rows in Matrices Influence Their Rank?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gutnedawg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proofs
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the influence of distinct rows in matrices on their rank, specifically proving that for an m × n matrix A of rank r with pairwise distinct rows, the rank of a submatrix B formed by s distinct rows satisfies the inequality rank(B) ≥ r + s - m. Additionally, it explores the existence of a basis B for a vector space V that includes a linearly independent set A and is a subset of a spanning set C. The proof establishes that A is contained within B, which in turn is contained within C. Lastly, it addresses the uniqueness of expressing a linearly dependent vector as a linear combination of preceding vectors in a set.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix rank and properties of linear independence
  • Familiarity with vector spaces and spanning sets
  • Knowledge of linear combinations and their uniqueness
  • Proficiency in mathematical proofs and inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Rank-Nullity Theorem in linear algebra
  • Explore the concept of basis and dimension in vector spaces
  • Learn about linear dependence and independence in greater depth
  • Investigate the properties of submatrices and their ranks
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of matrix theory and vector spaces.

gutnedawg
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
1. Let A be an m × n real matrix of rank r whose m rows are all pairwise distinct. Let
s ≤ m, and let B be an s × n matrix obtained by choosing s distinct rows of A. Prove
that

rank(B) ≥ r + s − m.

Solution:
Assume that s is the largest amount of distinct rows of A.

r = n-dimNul A
dimNul A= m-s
r=n-m+s
rank(B) ≥ n-m +s + s − m
rank(B) ≥ n+ (-2m +2s)
rank(B) = n- dimNul B
dimNul B = 0 since all rows s are linearly independet
rank(B) = n
n ≥ n -2m +2s
0 ≥ -2m + 2s
2m ≥ 2s
m ≥ s (dividing by 2)
Since this is given doesn't this conclude the proof? Or should I plug in the 0 so
rank(B) ≥ n + x where 0≥x
n ≥ n + x

2. Let V be a vector space, let p ≤ m, and let b1, . . . , bm be vectors in V such that
A = {b1, . . . , bp} is a linearly independent set, while C = {b1, . . . , bm} is a spanning set
for V . Prove that there exists a basis B for V such that A ⊆ B ⊆ C.

Solution:
I'm going on the fact that it does not mention C is linearly independent, thus by the spanning set theorem there exists a linearly independent set of vectors {bi,...,bk} which spans V. Thus, this set {bi,...,bk} is a basis for V.

This means that the basis must at least be equal to A since B cannot be a basis for V if there is another linearly independent vecotr bp. Meaning:

A \subseteq B

Also since B is a spanning set of V and is comprised of at least {b1,...,bp} it must be a subset of C since C also spans V and includes A.

Thus

A \subseteq B \subseteq C

3. Let {v1 , v2, . . . , vm} be an indexed linearly dependent set of vectors in a vector space V such that v1 is not 0v . Prove that there exists exactly one index 2≤ i≤m with the property that the vector vi can be expressed as a linear combination of the preceding vectors v1, . . . , v(i-1) in a unique way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For #3:

Suppose you found j, the lowest index i such that v_i could be written as a unique linear combination of {v1, v2 ... v_(i-1)}. Could you then find another i > j that could be written as a unique linear combination of {v1, v2 ... v_(i-1)}.

Do you know why j has to exist?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K