How Do Elastic Collisions on a Frictionless Ring Affect Object Velocities?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter luma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of two balls undergoing elastic collisions on a frictionless ring. Participants explore the implications of repeated collisions and the resulting velocities of the balls, questioning the physical interpretation of their outcomes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a scenario involving two balls on a frictionless ring, calculating their velocities after an elastic collision as -1 and 4.
  • Another participant challenges the correctness of the initial momentum calculations, suggesting that the momentum is not conserved as claimed.
  • A subsequent reply defends the original calculations, asserting that both momentum and energy are conserved, and reiterates the velocities remain the same in repeated collisions.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of the results, suggesting that if the velocities remain unchanged, it implies the balls would pass through each other, which seems nonsensical.
  • One participant introduces the idea of having two "mathematical" solutions for the collisions, indicating that one solution may be non-physical in certain scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the calculated velocities and the physical interpretation of repeated elastic collisions. There is no consensus on whether the outcomes imply that the balls pass through each other or if the calculations are indeed correct.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific values and conditions of the collisions, but there are unresolved questions regarding the physical implications of the results, particularly in relation to the nature of the collisions and the behavior of the balls over time.

luma
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/6725/diagramt.png

So I was doing this usual physics type question thing which goes along the lines kind of like this:

2 balls are constrained to a frictionless ring and collide elastically. What is their after velocities? Easy question using,

[tex]\frac{1}{2}m_{1}u_{1}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}m_{2}u_{2}^{2}=\frac{1}{2}m_{1}v_{1}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}m_{2}v_{2}^{2}[/tex]

[tex]m_{1}u_{1}+m_{2}u_{2}=m_{1}v_{1}+m_{2}v_{2}[/tex]

I got the (correct) answers of -1 and 4 for the after speeds.

The thing that confuses me, is that since the collision is elastic, if we repeat it for the next collision that happens on the ring then we will get the same answers of -1 and 4... What does this mean? It's saying that the balls will just pass through each other?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to check your original "correct" answer. Just doing the math in my head your momentum is not the same before and after the collision.
 
Subductionzon said:
You might want to check your original "correct" answer. Just doing the math in my head your momentum is not the same before and after the collision.

Yes it is. The book even says it's correct.

Energy before = 50J
Energy after = 50J

Momentum before = 20 kg m/s
Momentum after = 6*4 + 4*(-1) = 24 - 4 = 20 kg m/s

What I'm asking is that since the momentum and energy are conserved, if you do the calculations for a subsequent collision you will get the same velocities. But that sounds absurd and nonsensical!

Like if A is traveling 4 m/s CCW (counter clockwise), and B travels 1 m/s CW, then after they loop round and meet each other again... they are still 4 m/s CCW and 1 m/s CW! Why? That must be nonsense as it implies the balls passed through each other
 
hi luma! :smile:
luma said:
I got the (correct) answers of -1 and 4 for the after speeds.

The thing that confuses me, is that since the collision is elastic, if we repeat it for the next collision that happens on the ring then we will get the same answers of -1 and 4... What does this mean? It's saying that the balls will just pass through each other?

No, you get two "mathematical" solutions in each case, (5,0) and (-1,4).

You reject the first solution as non-physical in the odd-numbered collisions (technically, it is physical, and would apply if the balls somehow missed each other), and the second solution in the even-numbered collisions …

the 6kg ball keeps stoppping. :wink:
 
ahhh! yes, yes I did! very good! thanks :D Makes sense woo
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
107K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K