How Do Elastic Collisions on a Frictionless Ring Affect Object Velocities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter luma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
Click For Summary
In the discussion about elastic collisions on a frictionless ring, participants analyze the velocities of two balls after they collide. The calculations show that the post-collision speeds are consistently -1 m/s and 4 m/s, raising questions about the implications of these results. It is clarified that while momentum and energy are conserved, the same velocities in subsequent collisions suggest the balls would theoretically pass through each other. The conversation highlights the distinction between mathematical solutions and physical reality, noting that one solution may be non-physical in certain collision scenarios. Ultimately, the understanding of collision dynamics on a ring is reinforced through this examination.
luma
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/6725/diagramt.png

So I was doing this usual physics type question thing which goes along the lines kind of like this:

2 balls are constrained to a frictionless ring and collide elastically. What is their after velocities? Easy question using,

\frac{1}{2}m_{1}u_{1}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}m_{2}u_{2}^{2}=\frac{1}{2}m_{1}v_{1}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}m_{2}v_{2}^{2}

m_{1}u_{1}+m_{2}u_{2}=m_{1}v_{1}+m_{2}v_{2}

I got the (correct) answers of -1 and 4 for the after speeds.

The thing that confuses me, is that since the collision is elastic, if we repeat it for the next collision that happens on the ring then we will get the same answers of -1 and 4... What does this mean? It's saying that the balls will just pass through each other?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to check your original "correct" answer. Just doing the math in my head your momentum is not the same before and after the collision.
 
Subductionzon said:
You might want to check your original "correct" answer. Just doing the math in my head your momentum is not the same before and after the collision.

Yes it is. The book even says it's correct.

Energy before = 50J
Energy after = 50J

Momentum before = 20 kg m/s
Momentum after = 6*4 + 4*(-1) = 24 - 4 = 20 kg m/s

What I'm asking is that since the momentum and energy are conserved, if you do the calculations for a subsequent collision you will get the same velocities. But that sounds absurd and nonsensical!

Like if A is traveling 4 m/s CCW (counter clockwise), and B travels 1 m/s CW, then after they loop round and meet each other again... they are still 4 m/s CCW and 1 m/s CW! Why? That must be nonsense as it implies the balls passed through each other
 
hi luma! :smile:
luma said:
I got the (correct) answers of -1 and 4 for the after speeds.

The thing that confuses me, is that since the collision is elastic, if we repeat it for the next collision that happens on the ring then we will get the same answers of -1 and 4... What does this mean? It's saying that the balls will just pass through each other?

No, you get two "mathematical" solutions in each case, (5,0) and (-1,4).

You reject the first solution as non-physical in the odd-numbered collisions (technically, it is physical, and would apply if the balls somehow missed each other), and the second solution in the even-numbered collisions …

the 6kg ball keeps stoppping. :wink:
 
ahhh! yes, yes I did! very good! thanks :D Makes sense woo
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K