How do GPS Satellites work exactly?

AI Thread Summary
GPS satellites transmit signals containing their location and time, allowing GPS devices to determine their position by calculating distances from multiple satellites. The device does not measure distance directly; instead, it compares the time signals received from different satellites to calculate its position based on the time differences. This method relies on the satellites continuously broadcasting time signals, which are coded into the signals. In 3D space, at least four satellite signals are needed to accurately pinpoint a location, while a fifth signal helps assess measurement reliability. Understanding this process is essential for grasping how GPS technology functions effectively.
James_Space
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How do GPS Satellites work exactly, with emphasis on exactly.

I know that GPS satellites use electromagnetic waves to send out a signal of their current location and time for GPS devices to pick up. Using at least 3 GPS satellites, GPS devices can pin point their location by knowing the distance they are at from each satellite. 3 spherical intersections will pin point the location of a satellite down to a single point on a 2D surface.

What I want to know is how the GPS device knows how far away it is from each satellite. Do they use v=d/t to figure out the distance? That's what I initially thought, but I don't think this is correct. If all you get from a satellite is the time and location at which the signal was sent, then you should be able to compare that to the time that you received the signal. Unfortunately, this doesn't sound plausible to me as this would require almost every device to have an atomic clock that is set very accurately, or the calculations will be far off.

Could anyone explain this to me? It's for a school project I'm working on. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
James_Space said:
What I want to know is how the GPS device knows how far away it is from each satellite. Do they use v=d/t to figure out the distance? That's what I initially thought, but I don't think this is correct. If all you get from a satellite is the time and location at which the signal was sent, then you should be able to compare that to the time that you received the signal. Unfortunately, this doesn't sound plausible to me as this would require almost every device to have an atomic clock that is set very accurately, or the calculations will be far off.

Could anyone explain this to me? It's for a school project I'm working on. Thanks in advance!
Welcome to PF!

A GPS reciever doesn't need to calculate the distance to each satellite directly. It uses the difference in the time signals to calculate where it is between them. For a 1 dimensional example, consider if you were directly between two objects and each sent you a signal at the same time. The difference between the signals can be used to calculate how far you are from exactly in between them since if you were exactly between them, you'd receive the signals at exactly the same time.
 
russ_watters said:
Welcome to PF!

A GPS reciever doesn't need to calculate the distance to each satellite directly. It uses the difference in the time signals to calculate where it is between them. For a 1 dimensional example, consider if you were directly between two objects and each sent you a signal at the same time. The difference between the signals can be used to calculate how far you are from exactly in between them since if you were exactly between them, you'd receive the signals at exactly the same time.

Thank you for the quick response, and for welcoming me to the forums.

So you're saying that when a GPS device receives those three multiple signals, it simply compares the time at which they have been sent? Or the time that they have been received? Or are these two negligible since they travel at the speed of light?

So let's consider your 1D example. You have GPS device x, and Satellite A and B. x is somewhere in between A and B. If both A & B send out their location at 12:00 at noon, how would you calculate the location of x? Because I'm assuming x does not have an atomic clock on board, so comparing the times at which the signals were received are probably very small differences not detected by a normal clock on your ordinary smartphone.

If it's no problem, could you go in more depth on how this works. I'm a high school student btw, so I won't be able to understand things that are too complex. So if possible, simple terminology please. Thank you once again.
 
Let me briefly add, that while the basic principle behind GPS [1,2] is simple the GPS signal structure [3] broadcast by the satellites is not. Among other things these signals contains the actual information needed by the receiver to calculate the position of all the satellites as a function of time. Only once the receiver has this information it will be able to calculate its own position from the measured pseudoranges [4]. To speed things up, a receiver can use Assisted GPS [5] to "cheat" a bit and load the satellite positioning information from a source other than the satellites.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Positioning_System
[2] http://www.montana.edu/gps/understd.html
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS_signals
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNSS_positioning_calculation
[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assisted_GPS
 
Last edited by a moderator:
James_Space said:
So you're saying that when a GPS device receives those three multiple signals, it simply compares the time at which they have been sent? Or the time that they have been received? Or are these two negligible since they travel at the speed of light?
it is subtly different from the way I described:
The time they were sent is coded into the signal. The receiver compares signals that it receives at the same time, but have different time codes (as opposed to timing the difference between the same signal received at different times). Remember, the satellites are continuously emitting time signals. Sorry for the confusion.

There are a lot of sites out there you can utilize as sources. Just Google "GPS theory".
 
It's probably easier to start in 1-dimension. If you are on a line, between two satellites, and each satellite continually broadcasts the time, do you see how you could use the time difference to determine where you are between them? If not, we should start there.

With two satellites, you get two numbers, which can be converted into x (the 1-d position) and t. In 3D-space, you need four measurements, to convert to x, y,z, and t. A fifth measurement let's you place a single uncertainty on this number, so the system can determine if this measurement is reliable or not. And so on.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
69
Views
10K
Back
Top