How Do I Calculate the Shearing Force for Cutting Plastic?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the shearing force required for cutting plastic materials, specifically POM and Polycarbonate, with an ultimate tensile strength of 70 MPa. The user initially calculated a cutting force of 420 kN using the equation F = A x Ss, where A is the shear area (0.01m x 0.6m) and Ss is the shear strength. Participants highlighted that the cutting process does not sever the entire material at once, suggesting that factors like blade design and cutting velocity significantly influence the actual force required. The Merchant's Circle model was recommended as a foundational concept for understanding cutting force analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of shear strength and tensile strength in materials.
  • Familiarity with the equation F = A x Ss for calculating cutting force.
  • Knowledge of blade design principles, including helical blades and cutting velocity.
  • Basic concepts of cutting force analysis, particularly the Merchant's Circle model.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Merchant's Circle model for cutting force analysis in detail.
  • Research the impact of blade geometry on cutting efficiency and force requirements.
  • Explore textbooks on manufacturing technology for comprehensive insights into cutting mechanics.
  • Investigate the relationship between cutting velocity and force in rotary cutting applications.
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, manufacturing technologists, and anyone involved in the design and optimization of cutting tools and processes for plastic materials.

raniero
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
I have been assigned by my tutor to design a plastic granulator. After designing its features of the shaft, rotor etc I tried to calculate the force needed of cutting a piece of plastic (POM/Polycarbonate) having an ultimate tensile strength of 70 Mpa (shear strength assumed to be equal to tensile). The maximum thickness of the plastic slab was fixed to 0.01m and assumed to be the length of the blades, 0.6m. This set up would cater for the maximum cutting action since plastic material is spread all over the blades.

The equation I used was: F = A x Ss

where F is the cutting force, A is the shear area (0.01 x 0.6) , and Ss is the shear strength.

Using this equation the cutting force would be ridiculously large, 420 kN.

Can someone please point me in the right direction ? Books, examples and explanations are appreciated

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What is your objection to 420 kN?
 
420 kN sounds right for shear...

raniero said:
Can someone please point me in the right direction? Books, examples and explanations are appreciated

Ever tried to cut a tomato with a spoon? Why does a sharp knife require less force than spoon? How do you think you would calculate the cutting force required of a spoon vs a knife?

As far as cutting sheet goes, look at a pair of scissors, do they cut the entire sheet at once? Have you used a guillotine to cut sheet stock? they cut along the sheet like scissors.
 
Bystander said:
What is your objection to 420 kN?

The work was calculated using W=Fd, the rotor cuts 6 times per rotation and when calculating for 200 rpm the energy requirement is huge, in the tune of 7MW. Similar granulators have extremely lower power ratings.
 
And, if you examine them closely, you will notice that the blades are helices about the axis of the cutter --- they don't sever the entire 60 cm2 at once. Shears are built as guillotines for the same reason.
 
billy_joule said:
420 kN sounds right for shear...
Ever tried to cut a tomato with a spoon? Why does a sharp knife require less force than spoon? How do you think you would calculate the cutting force required of a spoon vs a knife?

As far as cutting sheet goes, look at a pair of scissors, do they cut the entire sheet at once? Have you used a guillotine to cut sheet stock? they cut along the sheet like scissors.

Thanks for your insight. A sharp knife has a very low area increasing pressure whick makes cutting 'easier'. Analysing the different areas of a knife and a spoon would show the force needed to cut.

Scissors do not cut at once no, but the design was made to do so (similar to marketed granulators)

I was suspecting that the cutting force I obtained was not realistic
 
Bystander said:
And, if you examine them closely, you will notice that the blades are helices about the axis of the cutter --- they don't sever the entire 60 cm2 at once. Shears are built as guillotines for the same reason.

Apart from the helical blades, if you consider the height, the blade does not penetrate the whole height (in my case 0.01m) in an instant but rather depend on the cutting velocity (in my case on rotational velocity since its a rotor). Does this make sens ? If so, how can I represent it mathematically to obtain maximum force needed ?
 
raniero said:
If so, how can I represent it mathematically to obtain maximum force needed ?

You have just exceeded my ability to assist --- I understand the question, but I can't tell you what to do to set it up, or how to solve it. Tool shape is going to sneak in on it as well --- hollow ground, wedge, relief, etc..
 
Merchant's circle is the most basic model:

http://www.learnengineering.org/2013/01/cutting-force-analysis-merchant-circle.html

A textbook on manufacturing technology is a good place to start.
 
  • #10
billy_joule said:
Merchant's circle is the most basic model:

http://www.learnengineering.org/2013/01/cutting-force-analysis-merchant-circle.html

A textbook on manufacturing technology is a good place to start.

Isn't merchant's circle based on the orthogonal cutting method ? If I recall correctly, the orthogonal cutting method can be used only when you can physically measure certain cutting forces, using these forces to 'derive' other forces to be used theoretically.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
28K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K