How Do I Calculate the Velocity and Include the Sling in Trebuchet Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahmadove
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trebuchet
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a projectile launched by a trebuchet, specifically addressing the role of the sling in the mechanics of the system. Participants explore the application of conservation of energy principles and the dynamics involved in trebuchet operation, as well as practical considerations related to projectiles used in school projects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to incorporate the sling into the energy calculations, questioning the relationship between potential energy of the counterweight and kinetic energy of the projectile.
  • Another participant suggests that modeling the trebuchet using conservation of energy between the ball and the counterweight may not be effective, indicating that it is more of a dynamics problem involving multiple accelerations.
  • A third participant recommends using a differential equation solver for a more comprehensive understanding of the principles involved in trebuchet design, though they acknowledge it may be complex for high school level.
  • Concerns are raised about the impact of air resistance on the wiffle ball used as a projectile, noting that its design may lead to unpredictable flight paths and rapid deceleration.
  • A participant shares a personal anecdote about building a trebuchet for a school competition, highlighting the practical application of physics in a fun context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to calculate the projectile's velocity or the role of the sling, indicating multiple competing views and unresolved questions regarding the mechanics of the trebuchet.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions and factors that could influence calculations, such as the specific design of the projectile and the dynamics of the trebuchet system, but these remain unresolved within the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students working on physics projects involving trebuchets, educators looking for insights into practical applications of physics concepts, and hobbyists interested in the mechanics of projectile motion.

ahmadove
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
SORRY if its the wrong place for the topic but I am new >.<
hi umm ... I am grade 11 and i got this trebuchet project for school, i built the thing
and now i got to do the calculations , i KNOW that mgh( for the counter weight) = 1/2 mv^2 ( for the projectile) but i don't know how to explain this, like WHY? is it so.. i know that according to the law of conservation of energy, that energy can neither be created nor destroyed, but i was thinking, as the counter weight drops down, its potential energy is transferred into it moving and as its a see-saw (or however u spell that) shape then the projectile gets the energy transferred too moving up (based on the axle) but if i want to calculate the velocity of the projectile then i have to be exact, like umm...the sling increases the range of the trebuchet, but with that above equation i don't see anything that includes the sling in it, where the sling does really have a big role in increasing the velocity and acceleration so.first how do i include the sling in there, second is how do i know the angle of departure of the projectile..its aprox 45 but idk...anyways here's the data:

projectile = wiffle ball, 47 grams
counter weight = 20 kg
distance traveled by proj. = 14 m
drop of counter weight = 66.5 cm
time...no idea..but after being calculated with an "attempt" i think its 0.74 sec..but i don't think that's right because it took longer than that while i t was airborne
attempted calculation initial velocity of proj = 26.9 m/s
so yah...any help? please
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Unfortunately, I don't think a trebuchet can be effectively modeled using conservation of energy between the ball and the counterweight. It's really a dynamics problem, where the counterweight accelerates the arm, which in turn accelerates the sling, which accelerates the ball.

Did you teacher tell you to make any special assumptions when analyzing the projectile or trebuchet as a whole? The calculations can be done, but it will take more than PE = KE...
 
ahmadove,

Welcome to PF!

If you have access to a DiffE solver, (ie; Mathematica) this is a really good treatment of the principals involved in trebuchet design;

http://www.algobeautytreb.com/trebmath35.pdf

At HS math level, the above may be beyond you... but I recommend you have a look anyway. You will gain an appreciation of all the variables involved and how they relate.
.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If a wiffle ball has holes in it - like the ones I saw a looong time ago - then
you have a HUGE air resistance factor to cope with. Since it is a school project, you probably cannot re-run your test with a small mass solid object that is not like a wiffle ball.

Wiffle balls decelerate very fast, and gollow an very unpredictable path.

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003APS..DFD.MJ005U
 
I helped my son and his buddies build one for senior year competition to shoot a waterballon. the score was 1/3 of the physics grade
school record was 15 meters. we reset it to 56 meters.
according to the rules of contest, they kids should have gotten 375 points
I don't think the school was as impressed as we were
(we shot water ballons all over the neighborhood that summer, and my wife was as impressed as the physics teacher)
why don't they have contests between companies for us grownups like that
good for 1/3 my annual pay raise

dr
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K