How Do I Convert the Gravitational Constant to Pixels?

AI Thread Summary
To convert the gravitational constant G into pixels for a physics project simulating satellite motion, the conversion involves dimensional analysis treating pixels as a unit of length. The gravitational constant G is given as 6.673 x 10^-11 m^3/(kg·s^2). By substituting the conversion factor of 1 pixel = 1829773.7957659496946338217168068 meters, G can be expressed in pixel units. The resulting formula is G = 1.089 x 10^-29 pixel^3/(kg·s^2) after dividing by the cube of the conversion factor. This approach allows for accurate scaling of gravitational forces in the simulation.
devil
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
gravitational constanT G -- HELP!



ok, right now I'm working on a physics project :) satelite motion around earth...I managed to create a program that simulates all that stuff...but I don't quite like my G constant!

In my program I want to recreate moon and Earth relationship!

so scale looks this way:
1pixel = 1829773.7957659496946338217168068 meters

so now I want my G number to be written in pixels, I know it's m*m*m/kg * s * s

so, I can't make up my mind, how to write that in pixels...:)

any help appreciated :)
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You can do it by dimensional analysis. Just treat a pixel as just another unit of length, as if you were going to convert G from SI units to British units.

First, let b = 1829773.7957659496946338217168068, where your conversion factor is "b meters per pixel." Additionally, I'm going to write G = 6.673*10^-11 m^3/(kg*s^2) here, but you should use a value to however many decimals you wish.

So:

<br /> \newcommand{\unit}[1]{\mathrel{\mathrm{#1}}}<br /> G = \frac{6.673\times 10^{-11}\unit{m^3}}{\unit{kg\cdot s^2}}\cdot<br /> \frac{\unit{pixel^3}}{(b\unit{m})^3}<br />

Therefore, your new value of the gravitational constant is:

<br /> \newcommand{\unit}[1]{\mathrel{\mathrm{#1}}}<br /> G = \frac{6.673\times 10^{-11}\unit{pixel^3}}{b^3\unit{kg\cdot s^2}}<br /> \approx \frac{1.089\times 10^{-29}\unit{pixel^3}}{\unit{kg\cdot s^2}}<br />

To make a long story short, divide by 1829773.7957659496946338217168068^3.
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top