How do I determine the load on a vertical prop in a cantilever beam system?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the load on a vertical prop in a cantilever beam system, one must analyze the deflections of the beams involved. The deflections are given by the formulas v (top beam) = (PL^3)/(3EI) and v (bottom beam) = (5WL^3)/(48EI) - (PL^3)/(3EI). The load on the prop can be derived from these deflections, considering the dimensions and material properties of the prop, such as its diameter and Young's modulus. Understanding the relationship between the loads and deflections in cantilever beams is crucial for accurate calculations. This analysis is essential for ensuring structural integrity in engineering applications.
phiska
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
If i have two cantilever beams with a vertical prop between the free ends as shown in diagram, how do i find the load on the prop?

I have the deflections of the beams to be:

v (top beam)= (PL^3)/(3EI)
v(bottom beam)=(5WL^3)/(48EI)-(PL^3)/(3EI)

the prop is of diameter d, and length a, with youngs modulus E.

Any hints/help appreciated!
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Didn't you ask this last week?
 
No, its a similar example, with the same arrangement but a different question.

This time I'm looking at the load on the prop.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Cantilever beam deflection with point mass and point load at the end
Replies
3
Views
3K
Deflection of partially loaded cantilever beam with non-homogeneous EI
Replies
3
Views
2K
Elasticity of a Tubular Cantilever Beam
Replies
8
Views
2K
Correlating Displacement and Strain in a Cantilever Beam System
Replies
12
Views
6K
Vibration of a cantilever beam problem
Replies
2
Views
2K
Deriving Strain in Cantilever Beam with Known Deflection
Replies
4
Views
6K
Relation between torsional and linear spring constants for a cantilever beam?
Replies
9
Views
18K
What is the best beam design for my aluminum tandem axle trailer?
Replies
33
Views
5K
Engineering Need help in solving SDOF cantilever
Replies
1
Views
1K
Cantilever Beam Stiffness Calculation
Replies
5
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top