MHB How do I determine the type of discontinuity for a discontinuous function?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the type of discontinuity for a function, one can classify it as removable, jump, or essential based on the behavior of the function around the discontinuity point. For the function (x^2 - 36)/(x+6), it is continuous at x=6 but discontinuous at x=-6 due to the denominator being zero. Factoring the function can help identify removable discontinuities if terms cancel out; otherwise, it may indicate an essential discontinuity. Understanding left-sided and right-sided limits is crucial for accurate classification. In this case, the discontinuity at x=-6 is removable since the function can be simplified.
LostMathStudent
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I need help with discontinuous functions. More specifically, how to determine what type of discontinuity they are, algebraically.

Example: Determine whether each function is continuous at the given x values. Justify using the continuity test. If discontinuous, identify the type of discontinuity

(x^2 - 36)/(x+6); at x=-6 and x=6

Alright, so I know the function is continuous at 6, but discontinuous at 6 because the value makes the denominator a zero.

Now, how do I determine what type of discontinuity this function is? Is there a certain way I should preferably be doing this? I'm honestly pretty lost.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Note that

$$\frac{x^2 - 36}{x+6} = x-6$$

What can you say about the discontinuities of this function then?
 
Last edited:
LostMathStudent said:
I need help with discontinuous functions. More specifically, how to determine what type of discontinuity they are, algebraically.

Example: Determine whether each function is continuous at the given x values. Justify using the continuity test. If discontinuous, identify the type of discontinuity

(x^2 - 36)/(x+6); at x=-6 and x=6

Alright, so I know the function is continuous at 6, but discontinuous at 6 because the value makes the denominator a zero.

Now, how do I determine what type of discontinuity this function is? Is there a certain way I should preferably be doing this? I'm honestly pretty lost.

Hi LostMathStudent! Welcome to MHB! :)

We usually distinguish 3 types of discontinuities: removable, jump, and essential.
You can find the classification of discontinuities on wikipedia.
It's possible though that in your textbook the names are slightly different.

In short, it's removable if the function is smooth, but there is just a point missing.
It's a jump if the function makes a jump at the point in question.
And otherwise it is called (by some sources) an essential discontinuity.

What type do you think you have?
 
I like Serena said:
Hi LostMathStudent! Welcome to MHB! :)

We usually distinguish 3 types of discontinuities: removable, jump, and essential.
You can find the classification of discontinuities on wikipedia.
It's possible though that in your textbook the names are slightly different.

In short, it's removable if the function is smooth, but there is just a point missing.
It's a jump if the function makes a jump at the point in question.
And otherwise it is called (by some sources) an essential discontinuity.

What type do you think you have?

I know the differences between all the discontinuities, except in our class we call essential discontinuity infinite discontinuity.

Could I factor the function, and then if they cancel out I know I have removable discontinuity? Then, if they don't cancel, I still have essential discontinuity.

I'm not sure if this works on all functions, including square root functions and piecewise functions. I'm assuming that square root functions can only have removable discontinuity, and piecewise can only have jump discontinuity.
 
LostMathStudent said:
I know the differences between all the discontinuities, except in our class we call essential discontinuity infinite discontinuity.

Could I factor the function, and then if they cancel out I know I have removable discontinuity? Then, if they don't cancel, I still have essential discontinuity.

I'm not sure if this works on all functions, including square root functions and piecewise functions. I'm assuming that square root functions can only have removable discontinuity, and piecewise can only have jump discontinuity.

That sounds pretty good.
Formally these classifications are done based on left-sided and right-sided limits.
Are you familiar with those?
Otherwise your classifications seem to hit the mark.

However, suppose you have the piecewise function:
$$f(x)=\begin{cases}
x &\text{if }x \ne 0 \\
1 &\text{if }x = 0 \end{cases}$$
Then the discontinuity at $x=0$ is removable instead of a jump discontinuity.Anyway, in your current problem you can indeed factor and cancel the denominator, making it a removable discontinuity.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top