Ruby_338
- 27
- 2
How come ##adiabatic \,work = C_v(T_2 -T_1)##
The discussion centers on the calculation of work done in an adiabatic process, specifically using the formula ##W = n \cdot C_{v} (T_{1} - T_{2})##, where ##C_{v}## is the specific heat at constant volume and ##n## represents the number of moles. Participants clarify that in an adiabatic transformation, the internal energy change ##\Delta U## is equal to the negative work done, as heat transfer ##Q## is zero. The confusion regarding the absence of the mole term in the initial formula is addressed, emphasizing the importance of including it for accurate calculations.
PREREQUISITESStudents of thermodynamics, engineers working with heat engines, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of adiabatic processes and their implications in physical systems.
Maybe he means "per mole" or "per unit mass.". Also, irrespective of the 2nd law, Q is equal to zero for an adiabatic process.Ssnow said:If the transformation is adiabatic you have that ##\Delta U=-W## for the second law of thermodynamics because ##Q=0##. So ##W=-\Delta U = n\cdot C_{v}(T_{1} -T_{2})## where ## C_{v}## is the specific heat for constant volume and ##n## represents the mole. It is strange that in your formula there isn't ##n##...
Ssnow