How do I find the work done in an adiabatic process?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of work done in an adiabatic process, specifically using the formula ##W = n \cdot C_{v} (T_{1} - T_{2})##, where ##C_{v}## is the specific heat at constant volume and ##n## represents the number of moles. Participants clarify that in an adiabatic transformation, the internal energy change ##\Delta U## is equal to the negative work done, as heat transfer ##Q## is zero. The confusion regarding the absence of the mole term in the initial formula is addressed, emphasizing the importance of including it for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the first and second laws of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of internal energy and specific heat capacity
  • Knowledge of adiabatic processes in thermodynamics
  • Basic algebra for manipulating thermodynamic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the adiabatic process equations in thermodynamics
  • Learn about the relationship between internal energy, work, and heat transfer
  • Explore the concept of specific heat at constant volume (##C_{v}##) in detail
  • Investigate real-world applications of adiabatic processes in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students of thermodynamics, engineers working with heat engines, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of adiabatic processes and their implications in physical systems.

Ruby_338
Messages
27
Reaction score
2
How come ##adiabatic \,work = C_v(T_2 -T_1)##
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
If the transformation is adiabatic you have that ##\Delta U=-W## for the second law of thermodynamics because ##Q=0##. So ##W=-\Delta U = n\cdot C_{v}(T_{1} -T_{2})## where ## C_{v}## is the specific heat for constant volume and ##n## represents the mole. It is strange that in your formula there isn't ##n##...

Ssnow
 
Ssnow said:
If the transformation is adiabatic you have that ##\Delta U=-W## for the second law of thermodynamics because ##Q=0##. So ##W=-\Delta U = n\cdot C_{v}(T_{1} -T_{2})## where ## C_{v}## is the specific heat for constant volume and ##n## represents the mole. It is strange that in your formula there isn't ##n##...

Ssnow
Maybe he means "per mole" or "per unit mass.". Also, irrespective of the 2nd law, Q is equal to zero for an adiabatic process.
 
  • Like
Likes Ssnow
I forgot to add the n. How did we get ## - \Delta U = n C_v (T_2-T_1) ## ?

Can you show me step by step?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Isn't it straightforward? How is C_v defined? What is nC_v\Delta T?
 
I don't know XD
 
Then start by checking. Per forum rules you should do your legwork, not ask others to do that for you.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
Okay. Ill remember that
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
27K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
6K