How do I interpret the units of my discrete convolution results?

  • Thread starter Thread starter csand
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discrete
csand
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble understanding the results of a discrete convolution. I have two functions:

1) High resolution spectra
2) Gaussian curve

The point of this operation for me is put the high resolution data in terms of the lower resolution represented by the guassian curve (filter)

I convolve one with the other, and the results seem reasonable. However I do not understand how to interpret my units.

It is my understanding that the final "length" or domain of my convoluted function will be:

len(1) + len(2) - 1.

So if I'm dealing in wavelengths or such units for my original function (1), how do I now map my new convoluted values to wavelengths? The domain of my convoluted function is bigger than either domain other the two original functions.

Do I "center" my convoluted data around the original data (1) and trim the values on the outside?

My understanding of this is limited so I hope the context to the question I've asked is understandable. I can try to elaborate if more information is required.

Thanks in advance,
Chris
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm going to assume that l1 is the length of your spectrum, l2 the length of your Gaussian kernel, and that l2 is odd. In that case, point i in your original spectrum corresponds to point i + (l2-1)/2 in the convolved spectrum. (So, yes, if you center the old on the new, you'll have the right correspondence.) Also, the length you give, l = l1 + l2 - 1, indicates that the real data are being padded at the ends when you do your convolution. You should not trust the end of the convolved spectrum. Only the central l1 - l2 + 1 values of the convolved data are free from contamination by the padding.
 
Thanks for the reply,
-C
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top