How do I prove the convergence of a Cauchy sequence using a telescoping sum?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving the convergence of a Cauchy sequence using a telescoping sum, specifically given the condition that the absolute difference between consecutive terms of the sequence is bounded by a decreasing geometric series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of a telescoping sum to express the difference between terms in the sequence and explore how to bound this difference. Questions arise regarding the selection of N in relation to epsilon and the implications of the infinite sum's convergence.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing insights on how to approach the selection of N based on epsilon. There is a recognition of the need to establish bounds for the terms involved, and some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between the terms of the sequence and the convergence criteria.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on ensuring that the bounds established are rigorous, reflecting the expectations of the course. Participants express some uncertainty about the foundational logic involved in the proof, indicating a learning process in understanding the concepts of convergence and Cauchy sequences.

daver00
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


My problem is this, you are given that for a sequence the following is true:
[tex]\left|x_{n} - x_{n+1}\right| < \frac{1}{4^{n}}[/tex]

So its an obvious case to prove the sequence is Cauchy.


Homework Equations


So I'll state the stuff just for the sake of it:
[tex]\forall\epsilon>0[/tex], [tex]\exists N\in\mathbb{N}[/tex], s.t. [tex]\forall m,n>N \Rightarrow |x_n - x_m|<\epsilon[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution


So I start by taking the telescoping sum:
[tex]|x_n - x_m| = |x_n - x_{n+1} + x_{n+1} + \cdots - x_{m-1} + x_{m-1} - x_{m}|[/tex]

[tex]|x_n - x_m| \leq |x_n - x_{n+1}| + |x_{n+1} -x_{n+2}|+\cdots + |x_{m-1} - x_{m}|[/tex]

[tex]|x_n - x_m| \leq \sum_{k=n}^{m-1} |x_k - x_{k+1}|[/tex]

[tex]|x_n - x_m| < \sum_{k=n}^{m-1} \frac{1}{4^k} = \frac{4}{3}\left(\frac{1}{4^m} - \frac{1}{4^n}\right)[/tex]

(I'm hoping this is all correct)
And here I'm stuck, I'm unsure about how to properly select an [tex]N[/tex] and [tex]\epsilon[/tex] ??

Do I simply say something like this:
[tex]|x_N - x_{N+K}| < \frac{4}{3}\left(\frac{1}{4^{N+K}} - \frac{1}{4^N}\right)[/tex]

for some integer K? And then sort of solve for an epsilon? Or should I find something slightly simpler that is also smaller than this and again find some N in this fashion? I'm just confused because I've got three unknowns here, m, n and epsilon, but I need to reduce this to one N right?

I'm kind of new to all this and I'm not really all that cosy on any of it yet, at least I got the telescoping sum part I guess.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to choose an epsilon. You need to pick an N dependent on epsilon. Your n, m aren't really unknowns, you know they are both greater than N. So you just pick an N.

From my experience, in these sorts of questions, you don't need to make explicit what N you choose, what you did is correct, all you need to say is that the infinite sum (of 1/4^k) is finite, which then tells you the tails of the sum tend to zero. So you can pick an N s.t.
[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{k=n}^{m}\frac{1}{4^k}[/tex] for n,m>N.
 
You're really close! Take a look at what you wrote right here:
[tex]|x_n - x_m| < \sum_{k=n}^{m-1} \frac{1}{4^k} = \frac{4}{3}\left(\frac{1}{4^m} - \frac{1}{4^n}\right)[/tex]

if m>N and n>N, can you make a bound on the right hand side? eg:

[tex]\frac{4}{3}\left(\frac{1}{4^m} - \frac{1}{4^n}\right) \le ??[/tex]
 
So is it just something like this?
[tex]\frac{4}{3}\left(\frac{1}{4^m} - \frac{1}{4^n}\right) \leq \frac{1}{3\cdot4^N}[/tex]
or even just this:
[tex]\frac{4}{3}\left(\frac{1}{4^m} - \frac{1}{4^n}\right) \leq \frac{1}{4^N}[/tex]

I'm fairly certain we need to make this stuff pretty water tight in this course, so I'm guessing that once I choose my N I'm going to need to work my way back to show the difference is less than epsilon, or is that just not usually the case for this sort of thing?
 
yeah exactly. So now if I give you epsilon = .01, what N must you choose to make |xn - xm|<epsilon?
 
I see! so I make it like this:
[tex]\frac{1}{4^N} < \epsilon[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{4}\ln\left(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\right) < N[/tex]

Or in other words, to answer you question I choose:
[tex]N>0.25\ln(100)>1.15[/tex], so [tex]N \geq 2[/tex]

Thank you so much, sorry for not being any good at the simple part. I'm a mech engineering student but I've recently started a degree in maths as well and while I can cope with really hard technical things, the simple logic is still strange voodoo to me...
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K