How do I solve for a matrix using base vectors and vector spaces?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding a matrix A that transforms given base vectors e1 and e2 into other vectors w1 and w2 within different vector spaces. The original poster expresses difficulty in calculating the correct matrix A based on the provided vectors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to express the base vectors as linear combinations of the target vectors and calculates a matrix based on this. Some participants question the correctness of the matrix derived and the necessity of finding its inverse.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of the matrix's properties and the relationship between the base vectors and the target vectors. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to reconsider the dimensionality of the vectors involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a potential misunderstanding regarding the calculation of the inverse of the matrix A, as well as the dimensionality of the vectors being used in the problem.

Kruger
Messages
213
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is quite easy, but I've still trouble solving this.

Given the two base vectors e1=(1,-2,0) and e2=(0,3,0) and the other ones of a different vector space w1=(1,0,0) and w2=(0,1,0).

I've to find a matrix A that that does the following Ae1=w1 and Ae2=w2

2. The attempt at a solution

Easy isn't it? I've done what the professor did to solve such problems:

Calculate: e1=1*w1+(-2)*w2
and: e2=0*w1+3*w2

thus that shouls yield the matrix A:(1, 0, 0; -2, 3, 0; 0, 0, 0)
where ; is written for different lines in the matrix A.

But if I calculate A*e1 I get something totally wrong.

Where's the mistake in my calculation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You calculated the inverse of A, expressing the e vectors as a linear combination of the w vectors:

Ae1=w1 so e1=A^(-1)w1
Ae2=w2 so e2=A^(-1)w2

Clearly, your answer for A is incorrect since the inverse of your A does NOT exist. For this reason, you need to drop the third dimension. So , for example, e1 becomes (1,-2) etc.

The way you proceed is correct though, except that your A is actually the inverse of A, and the inverse of A is indeed (1,0;-2,3). So acquire A now.

marlon
 
Last edited:
I don't understand exactly why I've to build the inverse of A, because I search A such that A*e1=w1 not that A*w1=e1.
 
ahh, k, I got it know, I took your hint marlon, thanks, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
15K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K