MHB How do I solve for F in F = 9/5C + 32?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alg
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve for F in the equation F = 9/5C + 32, one can start by multiplying both sides by 5/9. The correct manipulation leads to the equation C = 5/9(F - 32). This can be rearranged to isolate F, resulting in F = 9/5C + 32. The final expression confirms the relationship between Celsius and Fahrenheit temperatures.
alg
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
How do I solve for F in

View attachment 9570
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2020-02-28 at 9.16.34 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2020-02-28 at 9.16.34 AM.png
    865 bytes · Views: 100
Mathematics news on Phys.org
frctl said:
How do I solve for F in

Hint: Multiply both sides of the equation by 5/9.

-Dan
 
Is the following correct?

9/5C = 9/5F - 9/5(1/32)
C = F - 1/32
F = C + 1/32
 
frctl said:
Is the following correct?

9/5C = 9/5F - 9/5(1/32)
C = F - 1/32
F = C + 1/32

not quite ...

$C = \dfrac{9}{5}(F-32)$

as suggested by topsquark ...

${\color{red}\dfrac{5}{9}} \cdot C = {\color{red}\dfrac{5}{9}} \cdot \dfrac{9}{5}(F-32)$

$\dfrac{5}{9} \cdot C = \cancel{\dfrac{5}{9}} \cdot \cancel{\dfrac{9}{5}} ( F - 32)$ (note that any number times its reciprocal equals 1)

$\dfrac{5}{9} \cdot C = F - 32$

can you finish ?
 
F = 9/5C + 32

Thank you!
 
frctl said:
F = 9/5C + 32

correction ...

$F=\dfrac{5}{9} \cdot C + 32$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top