How Do Nuclear Generators Convert Energy to Rocket Acceleration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BitWiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Impulse
AI Thread Summary
Nuclear generators convert energy into rocket acceleration by producing energy in joules or GeV, which complicates the direct calculation of acceleration due to differing unit dimensions. Impulse, defined as force over time, can be derived from energy divided by velocity, but determining the appropriate velocity is challenging. Two hypothetical rocket scenarios illustrate that energy alone does not determine impulse; exhaust velocity and mass flow rate are critical factors. The relationship between energy and momentum can be expressed through equations that incorporate exhaust velocity and mass, emphasizing the importance of these variables in calculating rocket performance. Understanding these dynamics is essential for accurately assessing the implications of nuclear energy in propulsion systems.
BitWiz
Gold Member
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Problem: A nuclear generator produces energy used to accelerate a rocket. Given energy and mass, what is the acceleration a?

Nuclear generators produce energy in GeV or joules which have the dimensions L-2T-2M which has a force-over-distance (MaL) component which seems inappropriate or at least messy for acceleration. A better(?) unit, especially for delta-v, is force-over-time, ie impulse, with dimensions LT-2TM or LTM (momentum).

Impulse is then joules divided by (some) velocity. I can convert(?) by dividing joules by a "universal velocity" (the particle guys use c), or by forcing this (artificial) velocity to 1.0.(?)

In Case 1), a post on Wikipedia (here) in the "Momentum" section asserts that 1.0 GeV = 5.3 x 10-19 kgm/s which seems small by several orders of magnitude -- perhaps I don't understand what these units are really meant for ...

In Case 2), I'm forcing delta-v = aT = joules (where force is applied over exactly 1 meter) by using a unity velocity.

Despite the dimensional contortions, does the latter work? If so, are there hidden implications? For instance, the reaction mass used to propel the rocket could only be accelerated over 1.0 meters or this relationship falls apart, correct?

Are there any generalized equations for energy and power => impulse/momentum?

Thank you for your time.

Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Edit: Screwed up a superscript above. Should be "impulse = dimensions LT-2TM or LT-1M (momentum)."

Chris
 
By itself, the energy released by the rocket engine is not enough information to tell you what the impulse will be.

This can be easily seen in the following comparison:

In one second, Rocket 1 produces 4 g of exhaust at 500 m/s.
In one second, Rocket 2 produces 1 g of exhaust at 1000 m/s.

Assume both rockets weigh many tons.

These rockets put the same amount of energy into their exhaust. But the impulse of Rocket 1 is 2 times greater.

Now, this is not really a proper analysis because we didn't consider how much of the energy went into the rocket itself, but because the rockets weigh many tons (and thus achieve only very low speeds over the time period in question), the amount of energy in the rocket is negligible.

***

OK, so what do you need, in addition to the energy, to find out the impulse? Well, it's enough to know the exhaust velocity or the exhaust mass. (More properly, since rockets produce exhaust over time, you should know the power and the exhaust mass flow rate, but we'll let that go by assuming the time period is infinitesimal.)

If you know the exhaust velocity and the exhaust energy is E = (1/2)mv2, then the momentum of the exhaust is mv = 2E/v. Alternatively, if you know the exhaust mass, then the exhaust velocity can be calculated as v = (2E/m)1/2, and then mv = 2E/v as above.

Obviously the momentum of the rocket is equal and opposite to the momentum of the exhaust.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top