How Do Pulley Motions Influence Particle Dynamics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter f(m)
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulleys
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dynamics of two connected particles, A and B, influenced by pulley motion. It explores conditions under which particle B, hanging at height h and raised an additional height H, either reaches the table or not, depending on the mass ratio. The participants discuss proving these conditions using both the work-energy theorem and Newton's laws of motion. There is a focus on deriving the maximum height A can reach after B falls and how to approach the problem without relying solely on energy conservation principles. The conversation emphasizes the interconnectedness of different physical laws in analyzing the system's behavior.
f(m)
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was helping my friend with some questions regarding motions of pulleys and i am came up with the following question which i couldn't think of an argument... please check

Two particles A and B of masses M and m respectively are connected by an inelastic string which passes over a smooth pulley. Initially A is at rest on a smooth horizontal table and B hangs at a height h above the table. B is then raised through an extra height H and allowed to fall.
i. Show that if (m2/(M2-m2 ))H<h, B does not reach the table.
ii. If (m2/(M2-m2 ))H≥h show that, during the motion, A rises to a maximum height m{2(M+m)h+mH}/(m+M)

can anyone explain how the motion happens and what is the condition i need start to prove the above questions

thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the second part can also be proved:
after m hits the table ,the string becomes lose
find the velocity of M at that instant using work energy theorem
and then equate this K.E of M to its max potential energy(that corresponds to max height )
 
thanks for the reply aditya..
it did help but i am wondering is there any other way of proving it rather using conservation of energy theorem, can't we prove only using the Newton's laws of motion and with other required theorem
 
i think the work energy theorem itself is a manifestation of Newton's secomd law

we write

F(net)=ma

say the motion is 1 dimensional in the x-axis

F(x)=mvdv/dx
take the dx to the other side and integrate

integral(F(x)dx) =delta kinetic energy


so if u have done by work energy theorem ..u are indirectly doing by Newton's laws
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top