A Fluid Dynamics Problem with Confusing Results

In summary, the conversation discusses a problem involving fluid dynamics. The question asks for the time it takes for water to leak into a barge through a small hole. Two possible solutions are mentioned, one using a simple Bernoulli's principle analysis and the other taking into account the sinking of the barge and the variation of the head of water driving the flow. The problem also discusses the use of differential equations and the importance of considering the physics of the situation. Ultimately, the conversation suggests using a simple analysis with mean values to estimate the time in this scenario.
  • #1
Aldnoahz
37
1
Hi all,

I encountered a fairly straightforward problem involving fluid dynamics, but the result I got is very confusing and I seem not to understand where I got wrong.

This is the question:

A rectangular flat-bottom barge with a bottom area A=50 m2A=50~\text{m}^2A=50 m2 is loaded so that the bottom is at H=1 m below the surface. The density of water is ρ=103 kg/m3\rho=10^3~\text{kg/m}^3ρ=103 kg/m3 , and the water surface is perfectly still. A round hole with radius r=1 cm is made in the bottom of the barge, and the water starts leaking in. When the water level reaches h=5 cm, a bilge alarm will alert the barge operator. How long will it take for the water to reach the level 5 cm? (Assume that the Bernoulli’s equation is applicable.)

My attempt to the question:

First, at the surface of the water outside the boat: P_0 + rho*g* H = const
Second, inside the small hole at the barge where I call point 2: P_2 + 1/2*rho*(v_2)^2 = const
Third, at the surface of water inside the boat above the barge, where I call point 1:
P_0 + 1/2*rho*(v_1)^2 + rho*g*h = constApplying Bernoulli's equation, I now set first equation equal to the second,

P_0 + rho*g* H = P_2 + 1/2*rho*(v_2)^2

and for second and third:

P_2 + 1/2*rho*(v_2)^2 = P_0 + 1/2*rho*(v_1)^2 + rho*g*h

but what I find strange is that there is no way to get P_2 and v_2 and they get substituted as an intermediate value, and solving this equation set I can only get equivalence of first and third equations:

P_0 + rho*g* H = P_0 + 1/2*rho*(v_1)^2 + rho*g*h

rho*g*H = 1/2*rho*(v_1)^2 + rho*g*h

solving for v_1 = dh/dt = sqrt(2*g*(H-h))

and this gives me an extremely small time, smaller than 1, which is obviously physically not plausible.

I asked a lot of people and they don't seem to figure out why this is not correct, so I am posting to ask for help.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There are two possible solutions to this problem depending on whether you consider the sinking of the barge and the variation of the head of water driving the flow to be a significant factors in the analysis or not .

If you consider - or better can demonstrate - that these factors are not important then you can use a very simple Bernoulli's principle analysis .

A more complete analysis taking those factors into account would need to use both Bernoulli's principle and Archimedes principle . The neatest way to get an actual solution would be to set the problem up as a differential equation and solve it .

if you are not familiar with differential equations then there are other ways of getting an approximate solution .

First thing to do in any case is to post a clear diagram showing the basic geometry of the problem . It helps in problems like this to draw diagrams with relevant dimensions shown in correct proportion to each other .
 
Last edited:
  • #3
To be honest, under no condition is Bernoulli's equation valid during a problem like this because the depth (and therefore the flow) is varying in time. This is why the problem says to simply assume Bernoulli's equation is valid. That said, as @Nidum pointed out, there are a couple levels of difficulty here depending on how much of the physics you want to consider. If you don't consider the slow sinking of the barge that accompanies the filling, then this takes one form, and if you do consider that effect, the problem becomes harder. However, unless I am missing something, I don't see how you do this without a differential equation.

Either way you have a time-varying quantity in both the height of the water and the flow rate through the hole (and possibly the depth of the barge), so you are going to have to do some calculus.
 
  • #4
The barge only fills with 5 cm depth of water . That is a small change of level compared to the bottom of the barge being initially submerged by 1 metre .

Also the hole is very small compared to the bottom area of the barge . That suggests slow filling and slow sinking of the barge .

If I was doing this problem for some real purpose I would probably just do a very simple analysis using mean values .
 
  • #5
Nidum said:
The barge only fills with 5 cm depth of water . That is a small change of level compared to the bottom of the barge being initially submerged by 1 metre .

Also the hole is very small compared to the bottom area of the barge . That suggests slow filling and slow sinking of the barge .

If I was doing this problem for some real purpose I would probably just do a very simple analysis using mean values .

I suppose you could take it to its logical conclusions, say that since 1 m is 20 times larger than 5 cm, then the flow through the hole is effectively constant (even though it isn't really) and just do volume divided by flow rate to estimate the time. It would probably be pretty interesting to look at the error incurred by those two approaches as a function of the height ratio of the water levels.
 

Related to A Fluid Dynamics Problem with Confusing Results

1. What is a fluid dynamics problem?

A fluid dynamics problem is a mathematical and scientific problem that involves the study of the behavior of fluids, such as liquids and gases, in different conditions. It includes the analysis of how fluids move, interact, and change under various forces and constraints.

2. What causes confusing results in a fluid dynamics problem?

Confusing results in a fluid dynamics problem can be caused by a variety of factors, such as complex fluid properties, irregularities in the flow, or limitations in the mathematical models used to describe the behavior of the fluid. Environmental factors, such as turbulence or external forces, can also contribute to confusing results.

3. How do scientists approach a fluid dynamics problem with confusing results?

Scientists approach a fluid dynamics problem with confusing results by first analyzing the problem and identifying potential sources of confusion. They may then conduct experiments, use computer simulations, or develop new mathematical models to better understand the behavior of the fluid. Collaboration with other scientists and further research are also important in finding a solution.

4. What are some real-world applications of fluid dynamics problems with confusing results?

Fluid dynamics problems with confusing results have many real-world applications, including predicting and improving the aerodynamics of airplanes, designing efficient water or oil pipelines, and understanding the behavior of ocean currents. They are also used in weather forecasting, designing sports equipment, and developing medical devices.

5. How important is the study of fluid dynamics in science and engineering?

The study of fluid dynamics is essential in many areas of science and engineering. It helps us understand and predict the behavior of fluids in different situations, which is crucial in developing new technologies, improving existing systems, and solving various problems in fields such as aerospace, environmental engineering, and biomedical engineering. Fluid dynamics also has applications in everyday life, such as in plumbing systems and weather patterns.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
921
Replies
12
Views
264
Replies
2
Views
949
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
767
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
6
Views
540
Back
Top