How do relativity and magnetism affect each other?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Michio Cuckoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetism Relativity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the interplay between relativity and magnetism, specifically how the perception of magnetic forces varies with different reference frames. Participants explore the implications of special relativity on electromagnetic phenomena, including the nature of electric and magnetic fields and their observer-dependent characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the observation of magnetic forces between moving charges is dependent on the observer's reference frame, while the speed of light remains invariant across frames.
  • Others argue that classical and quantum electrodynamics are consistent with relativity, emphasizing that the distinction between electric and magnetic fields is observer-dependent and can be unified through the Faraday tensor.
  • A later reply questions the frame-dependence of electromagnetic effects, suggesting that while the interpretation may vary, the underlying physical effects are invariant and can be described using proper times of the charges.
  • Some participants assert that the division between electric and magnetic fields is artificial, advocating for a unified treatment of the electromagnetic field in special relativity.
  • There is a reiteration of the idea that the electromagnetic field can be described as a single entity, which acts on both stationary and moving charges without necessitating a separation into electric and magnetic components.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the observer-dependent nature of electromagnetic effects, but multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation and implications of these effects in the context of special relativity.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of electric and magnetic fields, as well as the unresolved mathematical steps in transforming between different reference frames.

Michio Cuckoo
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
i apologise if the following statements may sound a little unscientific, or appear to beat about the bush.

Now if two positive charges are traveling together side by side with a certain velocity wrt to me, i will witness a magnetic attraction between them. But if i am traveling together with these charges; i.e. they are stationary wrt to me, i will not witness any magnetic force.

So whether you witness any magnetic force or not depends on your reference frame.

Light itself is an electromagnetic wave. But according to special relativity, the speed of light is independent of your reference frame.

So the existence of a magnetic force between 2 charges is dependent on your reference frame, but the speed of an electromagnetic wave is completely independent? Although both seem to be manifestations of the electric force.


This gets even more confusing when you realize the only way to explain the magnetic force between both positive charges is to use special relativity and lorentz contraction.

So its kinda like using the invariance of one electromagnetic property to demonstrate the variance of another electromagnetic property.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Classical (as well as quantum) electrodynamics is a Poincare-invariant theory and thus there can never be a contradiction with electrodynamics and relativity. Of course, you have to take the right perspective.

Here it's important to note that the distinction between electric and magnetic field is indeed observer dependent. The right covariant object is the antisymmetric Faraday tensor, describing the electromagnetic field as one entity.
 
It is correct that the interpretation of effects is frame-dependent, but the effect isn't. If you start with charges at rest + you as an observer at rest what you will observe is an electric field i.e. an electric force (no magnetic field i.e. no magnetic force). For a moving observer (w.r.t. the charges) the electromagnetic field has to be transformed i.e. you will find a magnetic field as well; therefore you can interpret the effect as a mixture of electric force plus Lorentz force.

However the effect itself isn't frame dependent, i.e. the spacetime points defining the trajectories depending on the proper times of the charges are invariant objects (they become frame dependent only if you introduce frames i.e. coordinates).
 
The distinction between electric and magnetic fields is artificial, which is why a true treatment of EM theory in special relativity can avoid splitting the EM field (as expressed through the Faraday bivector) into electric and magnetic parts.

There is one electromagnetic field (in vacuum, at least), and it acts on currents, whether those currents be time-directed (stationary charges) or space-directed (what we would conventionally call a current).
 
Michio Cuckoo said:
Now if two positive charges are traveling together side by side with a certain velocity wrt to me, i will witness a magnetic attraction between them. But if i am traveling together with these charges; i.e. they are stationary wrt to me, i will not witness any magnetic force.
Yes. And the more you think about it, the odder this is. This oddity can be described in completely classical terms (you just did, in the quoted text), so predates SR. In fact, Einstein uses it in the introduction of his 1905 paper ("On the electrodynamics of moving bodies") as an example of the problem that he was solving.


Light itself is an electromagnetic wave. But according to special relativity, the speed of light is independent of your reference frame.

So the existence of a magnetic force between 2 charges is dependent on your reference frame, but the speed of an electromagnetic wave is completely independent? Although both seem to be manifestations of the electric force

Almost right... Replace the bolded words above with "electromagnetic field" and you'd have it. Mathematically, it's as vanhees71 says: the Faraday tensor describing the electromagnetic field is a single frame-invariant object that describes the electrical and magnetic fields that an observer at a given point with a given velocity will experience.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K