How do we define and calculate divergence in vector fields?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Urmi Roy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition and calculation of divergence in vector fields, exploring conceptual understanding, mathematical formulation, and intuitive interpretations. Participants raise questions about the meaning of divergence, its relationship to flux, and the implications of its mathematical representation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the equivalence of different definitions of divergence, particularly regarding flux and volume density.
  • There is a discussion about the term 'flow' in the context of divergence, with some questioning its applicability to all vector fields.
  • One participant presents a mathematical example of divergence calculation, prompting questions about the validity of the approach and the assumptions involved.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of explicit volume consideration in the del operator formulation of divergence.
  • Some participants note that divergence is described as a measure of expansion, yet they find this characterization unclear.
  • There is a suggestion that the divergence may not always indicate a source or sink of flux at a given point.
  • Several participants seek intuitive explanations for divergence, gradient, and curl, indicating a desire for deeper understanding rather than rote memorization.
  • One participant shares their experience with learning divergence and curl through limit forms and derivations, suggesting this approach enhances understanding.
  • Another participant discusses the implications of coordinate systems on the definitions of divergence and curl.
  • Questions arise regarding the dependence of velocity components on spatial variables and the rationale behind specific mathematical choices in derivations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express confusion and seek clarification on various aspects of divergence, indicating that multiple competing views and interpretations exist. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the definitions or implications of divergence.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding, particularly regarding assumptions in mathematical derivations and the applicability of definitions across different contexts. There are unresolved questions about the nature of divergence and its relationship to physical concepts like flow and expansion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and practitioners in physics, engineering, and mathematics who are grappling with the concepts of divergence, vector fields, and related mathematical formulations.

  • #31
That's fine with me,but you see,I have been rushing a little since I have exams every now and then...after this I have some points to get cleared about line integrals,surface integral and the theorems of vector calculus that I have just read through from Kreyzig(I don't have sound understanding of these..and believe me my teacher's can't help me!)...so I do have a little problem with time.
Will you guide me through what's remaining of vector calculus?...then I can take it easy and slowly,and rely on the fact that at the end of a couple of days, I'll be thorough in my understanding of vector calculus(I'll try not to bother you too much after that.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Everyone forgotten me? :(
 
  • #33
Okay,since I don't have much time left before my exams,I need to get my last set of questions cleared on curl...please please please help!

1. Is it possible to have Curl of velocity? Intuitively,what would that be?

2. I have noticed that the del operator used to define divergence and gradient fit in perfectly with the definition of these quantities...how does the determinant formulation of curl fit in with the true meaning of curl?...why do we use this determinant formulation?

3. In wikipedia,they interpret curl with the help of a ball with rough edges,and how the fluid moving past it makes it rotate...the magnitude of the rotational velocity is the value of curl...but this cannot be applied to any other vector(all vectors wouldn't make a ball rotate,e.g. displacement vector).

4.Talking of displacement vector,what is the curl of this vector...how would we interpret it intuitively?

5."The curl of a vector field F at a point is defined in terms of its projection onto various lines through the point. If is any unit vector, the projection of the curl of F onto is defined to be the limiting value of a closed line integral in a plane orthogonal to as the path used in the integral becomes infinitesimally close to the point, divided by the area enclosed."- this is from wikipedia...what does it mean?

My last and perhaps most important question:
The curl is defined as the 'microscopic circulation per unit area' (ref: http://www.math.umn.edu/~nykamp/m2374/readings/circperarea/) ...how does this definition tally with the usual way of defining curl that I mentioned earlier in the post?
 
Last edited:
  • #34
1. It will tell you about the angular velocity/acceleration at that point, but that's not very accurate.

2. If we jump ahead to 5 (which I'll explain later) and look at its definition, we can now define the components of the curl field along the xyz axes. Since the shape of the infinitesemal loop is not important (assuming everything is smooth enough), I would suggest taking a rectangular with sides parallel to the different axes (while computing you will have three of this loops). Calculating the circulation density:

curl(F) _{x}=lim \frac{\oint_{C_{yz}}\vec{F}\vec{dr}}{A_{yz}}
(C_{yz} is a rectangular loop parallel to the yz plain)

With this specific shape, will give you exactly the definitions of the derivatives. Summing all the components, you will recognize the structure of a cross product, or as you said, the determinant formulation.

3 & 4. This is just an explanation with analogy. However I don't see how a displacement vector can play a role of a vector field. A displacement vector is usually a function of t. With curl we are talking about functions of (x,y,z).

5. The projection of the curl against a specific direction, will tell you how much the field circulates around that direction at some point.
 
  • #35
elibj123 said:
1. It will tell you about the angular velocity/acceleration at that point, but that's not very accurate.

So it doesn't really have any physical existence,right?

elibj123 said:
2. If we jump ahead to 5 (which I'll explain later) and look at its definition, we can now define the components of the curl field along the xyz axes. Since the shape of the infinitesemal loop is not important (assuming everything is smooth enough), I would suggest taking a rectangular with sides parallel to the different axes (while computing you will have three of this loops). Calculating the circulation density:

curl(F) _{x}=lim \frac{\oint_{C_{yz}}\vec{F}\vec{dr}}{A_{yz}}
(C_{yz} is a rectangular loop parallel to the yz plain)

With this specific shape, will give you exactly the definitions of the derivatives. Summing all the components, you will recognize the structure of a cross product, or as you said, the determinant formulation.

Thanks,I've understood this.

elibj123 said:
A displacement vector is usually a function of t. With curl we are talking about functions of (x,y,z).

I should have taken this into account earlier!

elibj123 said:
5. The projection of the curl against a specific direction, will tell you how much the field circulates around that direction at some point.

Lastly,from what I get (especially from your answer to 3 and 4,)curl doesn't really have to make something (like a ball or a paddle) rotate...it's just a measure of how much the vector arrows are twisting,right?
 
Last edited:
  • #36
Please forgive me for extending even further...just my last two questions..

1. When we calculate curl,we reduce the area over which the path integral is being integrated to a single point--however,due to this, the magnitude of curl should always be very small,as the path integral over an area as small al that would be near to zero!
Am I saying something wrong?

2.Direction of curl is defined as the direction of maximum rotation...what doe the 'maximum' imply?
 
  • #37
Urmi Roy said:
1. When we calculate curl,we reduce the area over which the path integral is being integrated to a single point--however,due to this, the magnitude of curl should always be very small,as the path integral over an area as small al that would be near to zero!

But you divide by the (near-zero) area as well. This is similar to how the derivative is defined. The difference f(x+h)-f(x) will also be nearly zero (for continuous functions) as h goes to zero, but you divide by h, and so you get something else for the limit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
17K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K