How do we know the speed of light exists ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the existence and measurement of the speed of light, questioning whether it is a concept or a definitive value. Participants clarify that, unlike infinity, the speed of light is a measurable quantity, specifically 3 x 10^8 meters per second, derived from electromagnetic properties in a vacuum. It is emphasized that massless particles, such as photons, consistently travel at this speed, while massive particles cannot reach it. The conversation also touches on the mathematical foundations of light speed, referencing Maxwell's equations. Ultimately, the speed of light is established as a finite, measurable phenomenon rather than an abstract concept.
flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1
How do we know the speed of light "exists"?

If we "know" that it can't be reached, how do we know it exists? Like I am looking at this from a math view.

So okay, "infinity" is not a number, it is a concept. It took me about a year of convincing to settle it down.

So is the speed of light the same thing? Not a number, but a concept? How do know this certain number 3 * 10^8 is not possible? Because I am just loooking at this as a number and the book tells me this is impossible.
 
Science news on Phys.org


All light is electromagnetic radiation. It is derived by {1/\sqrt{\beta_0\epsilon_0}} where {\beta_0} is the magnetic permitivity in a vacuum and {\epsilon_0} is the electrical permitivity in a vacuum. This is the direct cause of Maxwell's equations.

Is light like infinity? I don't have that much exposure to the concept of infinity, but I would have to say no. Light is more like a number, than a concept in my opinion.
 


Unlike infinity, the speed of light is large but finite and can be measured experimentally.
 


What do you mean how do we know the speed of light exists? We measure it. What exactly is the issue?

You're confusing massive and massless particles. Massless particles (photons) always travel at 'c' and we observe them always traveling at that speed. Massive particles never reach 'c' and we've never observed them reaching 'c'.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top