How Do We Quantify Stress on Fabric at Support Contact Points?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around quantifying the stress on fabric at the contact points with rigid supports in a dome structure, particularly under conditions of external pressure. Participants explore theoretical frameworks and models related to membrane stress theory and the behavior of fabric under tension.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the fabric experiences tensile stress due to external pressure, questioning whether this stress is greater at the contact points with the supports or evenly distributed.
  • Another participant suggests that membrane stress theory may be applicable to analyze the situation, indicating that there is existing information on this topic related to tent-like structures.
  • A participant shares a drawing to clarify the arrangement of the beams and fabric, expressing interest in membrane stress theory but noting a lack of specific resources addressing their question.
  • One viewpoint posits that if the beams are tubular and there are no sharp edges or fasteners, the tensile stress in the fabric over the beams would be similar to that in unsupported regions, likening it to a rope over a pulley.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the previous claim, indicating that it intuitively seems incorrect but acknowledges the validity of the rope and pulley analogy.
  • Concerns about fretting between the fabric and supports are raised, referencing historical issues faced by designers of rigid airships.
  • One participant emphasizes the need for a theoretical understanding of stress distribution in an idealized scenario where both fabric and supports are perfect materials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the distribution of stress at the contact points, with some suggesting it may not be significantly greater than in unsupported areas, while others challenge this perspective. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the quantification of stress in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their understanding and the need for further exploration of membrane stress theory and its application to the specific geometry of the dome structure.

Daniel Sellers
Messages
117
Reaction score
17
Suppose we have a dome of fabric supported by radial rigid beams. The pressure (air or water pressure) outside the dome is significantly higher than inside the dome (perhaps the inside is even at vacuum).

Because the material is fabric (non rigid) the compressive force from the higher pressure outside will cause a tensile stress within the fabric (please feel to correct me if there's anything wrong with the statement.

Assuming the fabric is strong enough to resist tearing, and the supports underneath are strong enough not to collapse, is the fabric under more stress at or around the contact area where the fabric meets the supports? or would the tension be evenly distributed throughout the fabric?

Intuitively it seems like the area of contact between fabric and support would be under more stress because it is being stretched over a rigid object, but if that is the case then how can we quantify the additional stress at the support?

Emphasis on the "how do we quantify" part of the question. I am willing to fallow to any links or reading recommendations that might lead me to a way to answer this question, but a simple 'yes there will be more stress there' is not what I'm looking for.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Post a drawing showing the actual arrangement of beams and fabric covering that you have .

This is probably going to be a problem that can be analysed using membrane stress theory . There is information on the internet about this and it's specific application to tent like structures .
 
Last edited:
This Figure should get the point across I hope.

Forum Diagram.png

Thanks, I will look into membrane stress theory. I've done a little reading on surface structures but haven't been able to find anything which addresses a question quite like this.
 
One view to take is to suppose that the radial beams are tubular in x-section such that there are not edge contacts with the fabric and without stress creating fasteners between the fabric and the beams; and then to look at the case of a strip of fabric wrapped over a beam. What that basically equates to (ignoring friction) is a strip of fabric stretched over a flat pulley; and, that would tend to indicate that the fabric tensile stress over a beam would be equal to that in the adjoining unsupported regions of the fabric. (i.e. as per a rope over a pulley).

Of course, this does not address any possible effects due to the dome shape of the structure.
 
JBA said:
One view to take is to suppose that the radial beams are tubular in x-section such that there are not edge contacts with the fabric and without stress creating fasteners between the fabric and the beams; and then to look at the case of a strip of fabric wrapped over a beam. What that basically equates to (ignoring friction) is a strip of fabric stretched over a flat pulley; and, that would tend to indicate that the fabric tensile stress over a beam would be equal to that in the adjoining unsupported regions of the fabric. (i.e. as per a rope over a pulley).

Of course, this does not address any possible effects due to the dome shape of the structure.

So if I'm understanding you correctly you're saying that barring any sharp edges or fasteners the tensile stress in the fabric would not be significantly larger on the area of contact with the tubular beams. For some reason that intuitively doesn't seem right, but I think I've seen pretty rigorous versions of the rope and pulley you're referencing so maybe that is the case.

I'm going to keep looking into this, thanks for the replies. Any more thoughts or references would be appreciated.
 
One of the big difficulties with loaded fabric over ribs type constructions is fretting . Both of the fabric and the ribs .

Fretting was a major problem for designers of the old rigid airships like the R100 and R101 .
 
Nidum said:
One of the big difficulties with loaded fabric over ribs type constructions is fretting . Both of the fabric and the ribs .

Fretting was a major problem for designers of the old rigid airships like the R100 and R101 .

I'll certainly keep that in mind, but what I'm looking for right now is a more theoretical answer about the stress in different locations if the fabric and supports where both perfect materials of some kind.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K