How do we technically work with differentials?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the treatment of differentials, specifically "dx" and "dy," in calculus. While these differentials represent infinitesimally small changes, there is debate about whether they can be manipulated like fractions. The question arises as to why mathematicians often treat derivatives as if they are fractions despite the technical distinction. The conversation highlights a potential gap in understanding or teaching regarding the nature of differentials. Clarification on this topic is sought to resolve the apparent contradictions in their usage.
Brom
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
So this is a somewhat random question as I'm asking it not because I've ever seen it as any sort of homework problem or the like, but more that I just can't seem to find a good explanation for it.

Long ago I first learned about taking limits and, eventually, calculus. And of course in working with calculus we first see our beloved differentials of x and y "dx" and "dy," respectively. We learn that it is some infinitesimally small change in the x or y variable (respectively), and to find a derivative with respect to some variable, we compare an infinitesimally small change in the function versus a comparably small change in our chosen variable.

It was also dropped to me somewhere along the track that "dx/dy isn't technically a fraction"... and yet time after time we'll "multiply two sides of the equation by dx or dt" to help solve a differential equation, set up an integral, etc.

So I suppose my question is... can we really treat these differentials as "just really tiny numbers" that can be multiplied divided etc. to our liking? If I'm remembering correctly, Einstein once confessed to treating derivatives like fractions and later realizing it was a mistake. But if it is, why do we time and time again "play around with them" as if a derivative is a fraction?

Perhaps I just got lost somewhere along the way I got lost in definitions, or perhaps it's a fuzzy topic not usually covered thoroughly? It just irks me to no end!

Thanks in advance for any illumination or clarification anyone might have.

- Brom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, thanks for the link. I might follow up by looking at the one book in there that was referenced.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K