How Do You Apply the Washer Method Correctly?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stripedcat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Shell
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Washer Method and the Shell Method for calculating volumes of solids of revolution, specifically when rotating regions around the x-axis and y-axis. Participants explore the correct setup of integrals and the relationships between the methods.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an initial setup for the Washer Method, specifying outer and inner radii and the integral to be evaluated.
  • Another participant corrects the first by stating that if rotating about the x-axis, the integral should be along the x-axis and provides their own expressions for the outer and inner radii.
  • A third participant suggests drawing the cross-section rectangle to clarify the integration approach and confirms that both the Washer and Shell methods yield the same volume for the given region.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the correct integral setup for the Shell Method when rotating about the y-axis, noting that it should be referred to as the disk method in this context.
  • A participant expresses confusion over their notes and acknowledges potential errors in their understanding, indicating a need to revisit lecture materials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct setup for the integrals depending on the axis of rotation, with no consensus reached on the initial integral presented. Some participants agree on the results obtained using the Shell Method, while others challenge the correctness of the initial setup.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of possible errors in lecture materials that participants are referencing, leading to confusion in their calculations and setups. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the correct application of the Washer and Shell methods in this context.

stripedcat
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Just doing the Washer Method for now, once that's sorted out I'm going to see if I can do the Shell Method. I just want to be sure I'm doing this right here.

View attachment 2649

That's x=0, y=2, y=5-x

This is around the X-Axis.

R(y) = 5+y, r(y)=2

Assuming that part is at least correct. The integral goes from 2 to 5.

[math]\pi \int (5+y)^2 - (2)^2[/math]
[math]y^2+10y+21[/math]
[math]y^3/3+5y^2+21y[/math]

Then insert 5 and, solve, then the 2, solve, and subtract the 2 result from the 5 result, then the that result times pi?
 

Attachments

  • graph.jpg
    graph.jpg
    4.5 KB · Views: 125
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are rotating that region about the $x$-axis, your integral should be along the $x$-axis (using "$dx$").

The outer radius is going to be:

$R(x) = 5 - x$

and the inner radius is going to be:

$r(x) = 2$.

So each washer will have "volume":

$\pi((R(x))^2 - (r(x))^2)\ dx$

From your diagram, it appears we are integrating from $x = 0$ to $x = 3$, so the volume of the solid of revolution is:

$\displaystyle V = \pi\int_0^3 (5 - x)^2 - 4\ dx$

The integral you are trying to work out is revolution about the $y$-axis, so there is some confusion here, but even if it were about the $y$-axis, the integral you have listed is not correct.
 
One thing that may help is that you draw the cross-section "rectangle" that you are trying to integrate across. If you want to use washer/disk, the rectangle should be perpendicular to the axis of rotation. If you want to use shell method, it should be parallel.

If you evalulate the integral posted by Deveno, you get $27 \pi$.

You can check that if you use the shell method, you get:

\[
2\pi \int_a^b y h(y) dy = 2\pi \int_2^5 y (5-y) dy = 27 \pi
\]

The results are both equal.
 
Deveno said:
If you are rotating that region about the $x$-axis, your integral should be along the $x$-axis (using "$dx$").

The outer radius is going to be:

$R(x) = 5 - x$

and the inner radius is going to be:

$r(x) = 2$.

So each washer will have "volume":

$\pi((R(x))^2 - (r(x))^2)\ dx$

From your diagram, it appears we are integrating from $x = 0$ to $x = 3$, so the volume of the solid of revolution is:

$\displaystyle V = \pi\int_0^3 (5 - x)^2 - 4\ dx$

The integral you are trying to work out is revolution about the $y$-axis, so there is some confusion here, but even if it were about the $y$-axis, the integral you have listed is not correct.

It actually wants both, I just typo'd the X axis because it was the first one and I was sure on how to do that one.

It's valid for the Y axis then?
 
If we are rotating about the $y$-axis, we really ought to call it the "disk" method, because we don't have a "hole" in the middle.

In that case, we have: $R(y) = 5 - y$ and our volume element is:

$\pi(R(y))^2 dy = \pi(5 - y)^2\ dy$, so that we have:

$\displaystyle V = \pi\int_2^5 (5 - y)^2\ dy$

which again, is not the integral you originally posted.
 
Hrm, well crap, my notes are wrong then. I somehow got the impression that rather than just solving y= 5 - x that you just reversed it, which would make it + instead of -. I'll have to re-watch the lecture.

EDIT: Oh fantastic, the lectures are wrong... Again.

Thank you for the help though. I'll be back once I email the instructor...

Again.

EDIT2:

How in the heck did I get the x-axis rotation right then? I was using faulty information and got lucky? My answer totally agrees with that above 27pi, which is the result of a x^3/3-5x^2+21x with a 3 plugged in for the x value.

And the lecture on arc length seems to have the same error as the shell method video... gah!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K