How Do You Approach Unique Physics Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gokul43201
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicist Thinking
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the problem-solving approach presented in "Thinking Like a Physicist," a collection of qualifier problems from the University of Bristol's Physics Department. Participants highlight the unique nature of these problems compared to standard physics texts, noting their emphasis on order of magnitude estimates and reasonable assumptions. A specific problem is mentioned, involving the calculation of a planet's radius based on its temperature at the melting point. The solution requires applying basic concepts such as gravitational potential energy, energy conservation, and specific heat, while also making critical assumptions about neglecting radiation and electrostatic potential energy. The problem illustrates how the calculated radius aligns with Earth's size and leads to further considerations about larger planetary bodies, like gas giants. Overall, the discussion appreciates the refreshing perspective and intellectual challenge these problems provide.
Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
7,207
Reaction score
25
Anyone worked on problems from "Thinking Like a Physicist" ? This is a compilation of qualifier problems from the University of Bristol (I think) Physics Dept. - very different from the standard physics problems you come across in texts like Irodov, Resnick, etc.

I found them quite refreshing !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
any particular problem in the book you found mind boggling? (that makes you look like this:
:eek: ).
 
Most of the problems involve making order of magnitude estimates, using reasonable assumptions.

I think the first problem in the book went something like this :

"A widely dispersed collection of particles condense into a planet. If the planet's temperature is at its melting point, what is its radius ?"













Sweet and simple; the solution of this problem requires the application of just a few simple concepts (grav. PE of a sphere, energy conservation, specific heat). The important trick is deciding if a certain assumption is reasonable to make (neglect radiation, electrostatic PE).

If you solve the problem reasonably well, you find the radius of the planet to be of the order of Earth's radius. No surprise there - we do have a molten core. Then you ask yourself what would happen if the planet were much bigger than this critical radius - why, gas giants, of course !

Neat, wot ?
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
Back
Top