How Do You Calculate Parameters of a Parallel-Plate Air Capacitor?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating parameters of a parallel-plate air capacitor, specifically focusing on capacitance, charge, electric field, and energy stored. The setup involves two plates that are 16 cm square and spaced 3.7 mm apart, connected to a 12-V battery.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relevant equations for capacitance and related parameters, with attempts to substitute values into the equations. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of the area of the plates, specifically whether "16 cm square" refers to 16 cm² or (16 cm) x (16 cm). There are also inquiries about the expected units and significant figures for the answer.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, attempting calculations and questioning the assumptions made about the area of the plates. There is no explicit consensus, but some guidance is offered regarding the interpretation of the area and the potential for errors in the answer key.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the correct interpretation of the area measurement, and participants note constraints related to the number of attempts allowed for submitting answers. The discussion also highlights the need to ensure that the answer format aligns with the system's requirements.

thunderjolt
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A parallel-plate air capacitor is made by using two plates 16 cm square, spaced 3.7 mm apart. It is connected to a 12-V battery. What is the capacitance? What is the charge on each plate? What is the electric field between the plates? What is the energy stored in the capacitor?



What I believe to be relevant equations:
C=KC_0=Kε_0*A/d
Q=CV
E=Q/(ε_0*A)
U=.5QV=.5CV^2
K for air is1.00059




3. The Attempt at a Solution :
Really I'm just stuck on the first part. I tried C=KC_0=Kε_0*A/d, and put in C=(1.00059*8.854*10^-12*.0016/.0037)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thunderjolt said:
C=(1.00059*8.854*10^-12*.0016/.0037)

Yes, evaluate.

ehild
 
Be careful with the area of the plates, particularly in converting to square meters.

Is "16 cm square" the same as 16 cm2, or does it mean (16 cm) x (16 cm)?
 
gneill said:
Be careful with the area of the plates, particularly in converting to square meters.

Is "16 cm square" the same as 16 cm2, or does it mean (16 cm) x (16 cm)?

That's the exact question word-for-word, so I can't tell either. The answer I got from doing the calculation was 3.83pF, which is wrong.
 
thunderjolt said:
That's the exact question word-for-word, so I can't tell either. The answer I got from doing the calculation was 3.83pF, which is wrong.

Suggest you try the other interpretation.
 
gneill said:
Suggest you try the other interpretation.

The other option also resulted in a wrong answer. 6.13*10^-11F using an area of (.16m)^2. I've 3 tries left.
 
thunderjolt said:
The other option also resulted in a wrong answer. 6.13*10^-11F using an area of (.16m)^2. I've 3 tries left.

Does the system want the answer in any particular units? Significant figures?
 
gneill said:
Does the system want the answer in any particular units? Significant figures?

It asks for Farads, and to put everything as XXX*10^Z. I have done so. I've used Mastering Physics all last year, so I know how to deal with the inputs.

Is there some special integral or another equation that I could try?

P.S. The way I'm doing the problem is exactly like the example in the book.
 
thunderjolt said:
It asks for Farads, and to put everything as XXX*10^Z. I have done so. I've used Mastering Physics all last year, so I know how to deal with the inputs.

Is there some special integral or another equation that I could try?

P.S. The way I'm doing the problem is exactly like the example in the book.

The equation is correct, and it appears to me that you've obtained a correct answer. If the method of data entry is also correct then it is possible that the machine's answer key is wrong. This has been known to happen from time to time. You should report it to your course instructor.

You might want to see if the capacitance value obtained returns correct results for other parts of the problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K