MHB How Do You Calculate Sample Size for a T-Test with a 95% Confidence Interval?

  • Thread starter Thread starter markosheehan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
View attachment 7546

i am stuck on question 12

I am trying to use the hypothesis testing 1 sample t test formula .

the right answer is 338 but I can not get this
 

Attachments

  • WIN_20171118_10_55_32_Pro.jpg
    WIN_20171118_10_55_32_Pro.jpg
    92.3 KB · Views: 121
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think this question has to do with the lower bound of the confidence interval since the mean of the sample is above 100. What is the formula you've been given to calculate a confidence interval of a mean? What values do we already have that fit into that equation?
 
So the forumula is x-u/(s/✓n). Where X is the value 101.6

U is the mean which is 100,s is the standard deviation which is 15 , n is the size of the sample which is what we are looking for. What I'm not sure is what I am supposed to equal this to. I know it's something to do with the 5% level of confidence, but that forumula gives its answer as a z value.
 
markosheehan said:
So the forumula is x-u/(s/✓n). Where X is the value 101.6

U is the mean which is 100,s is the standard deviation which is 15 , n is the size of the sample which is what we are looking for. What I'm not sure is what I am supposed to equal this to. I know it's something to do with the 5% level of confidence, but that forumula gives its answer as a z value.

On the right track!

So here's our confidence interval formula: $$\overline{x} \pm t^{*} \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}$$.

Like you wrote, we just care about the lower bound so we can ignore the upper bound for now. The $t$ here corresponds to the 95% confidence level. Usually we say when $n>30$ we can use the normal distribution which would make $t=1.96$. If we plug that in we get:

$$100 = 101.6 -1.96 \frac{15}{\sqrt{n}}$$

Now we want to solve for $n$.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top