How Do You Calculate Specific Heat and Identify Unknown Substances?

Click For Summary
To calculate the specific heat, first determine the energy required to raise the temperature of 18 kg of carbon from -5°C to 17°C using the formula energy = C × m × ΔT, where ΔT is the temperature change. The calculation shows that the energy needed is approximately 3.3 kJ, but the delta T should be corrected to 22°C. For the second part, to find the specific heat capacity of the unknown substance, apply the same formula with the given values: 200 g absorbs 7320 J while its temperature rises from 5°C to 30°C. Solving for C will yield the specific heat capacity, which can then be compared to known values to identify the substance. Accurate calculations and reference tables are essential for determining the unknown material.
lynn0808
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Need help... Dont know how to solve correctly.

a) Determine the amount of energy to raise the temperature of 18kg of carbon from -5celsius to 17celsius.

b) 200g of a certain substance absorbs 7320J of energy and experienced a temperature rise form 5celsius to 30celsius. By calculating its 'C' value, identify as near as possible, the unknown substance.

here's some work I did

delta t= 17-5=12Celsius.
M=18kg
C=709j/kg
energy=cXmXdelta t
709J/kg.K X 18kg X12K
energy=3.28 KJ
=3.3 X10^2?

how do you solve for b. I don't know how to do it. Is this working correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For (a), please check your delta t.

For (b), you use the same equation you did for (a). You solve for c, the specific heat capacity. The idea is to find this value and look it up in a table and see what material it corresponds to.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
54
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K