How Do You Calculate Tension in Unequally Lengthed Cables Lifting a Beam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tooperoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cables
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the tension in two chains (AB and CB) lifting a 5m long uniform beam AC with a mass of 600kg. The chains have lengths of 3m and 4m respectively, forming a right triangle configuration (3-4-5 triangle) when the beam is lifted. Participants suggest using the Law of Cosines to determine the angles and recommend creating a free body diagram at point B to analyze the forces and solve for the tensions in the chains. The center of mass of the beam should ideally align directly below point B when lifted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly tension and equilibrium
  • Familiarity with the Law of Cosines for angle calculations
  • Ability to construct and interpret free body diagrams
  • Knowledge of right triangle properties, specifically the 3-4-5 triangle
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Law of Cosines in detail for solving triangle-related problems
  • Learn how to create and analyze free body diagrams in physics
  • Explore the concept of center of mass and its implications in static equilibrium
  • Review tension calculations in systems involving multiple forces and angles
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and statics, as well as engineers involved in structural analysis and design.

tooperoo
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




A 5m long uniform beam AC with mass of 600kg is being lifted from the ring at B by two chains (AB, 3m long and CB, 4m long). Determine the tension in chain AB and CB when the beam is clear of the ground.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried dividing it into 2 right angle triangles but doesn't the non-equal length sides mean it's not a right angle triangle? I'm struggling to find the angles because of this.

Picture_3.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there's tension in the two chains, then you are going to have a 3-4-5 triangle. This is a right triangle.

Do you think that the beam is going to remain horizontal after both ends are off the ground? If not, which end do you think will be higher? How many unknowns do you assess are required to solve this problem?

Chet
 
Use the Law of cosines to find the angles. Then do a free body diagram of point B (keeping in mind that the horizontal components of the tension in each wire are equal but opposite, and that the sum of the vertical components equal the tension in the upper wire above B) and solve for the vertical components using vectors and the angles.
 
The 3 side will be higher, no? But how do we find the missing side of the right angle triangle? c^2 = a^2 + b^2 would give the missing height, but a different answer depending on if the 3m side is used or the 4m side is used.

To solve this, all i would need is the angles of the right angle triangles right? I can solve the tensions from there?
 
As I already said, if there is tension in the chains, then the triangle is going to be a right triangle, with sides 3, 4, and 5. Let θ be the angle that the beam makes with the horizontal after it loses contact with the ground, and let T1 and T2 be the tensions in the two wires. Note that θ also represents the angle through which the entire 3-4-5 triangle rotates. Thus, specifying θ completely specifies where all points on the triangle will move to.

Chet
 
This is what I think about how much the load swings...
 

Attachments

  • load.png
    load.png
    7.6 KB · Views: 596
mark.watson said:
This is what I think about how much the load swings...

Surely the center of mass of the beam should end up directly below B? It would seem to represent the lowest energy state (gravitational PE).

attachment.php?attachmentid=60896&stc=1&d=1376445974.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    4.3 KB · Views: 893
gneill said:
Surely the center of mass of the beam should end up directly below B? It would seem to represent the lowest energy state (gravitational PE).

Good point. My mistake. It seems so obvious: I don't know what I was thinking!
 
Last edited:
mark.watson said:
Good point. My mistake. It seems so obvious: I don't know what I was thinking!

Been there, done that! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
Then what's next?
 
  • #11
Kerima Sales said:
Then what's next?
The last post when the thread was active was from August 2013. The OP (Original Poster) was last active in January 2014. Somehow I doubt that he or she will interested in continuing the problem here.

If you are working on the same problem and need help you'll need to show your own attempt at solution just as though you were posting the problem yourself. No help can be given until effort is shown (it's in the forum rules!).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K