How Do You Calculate the Dynamics of a Mass Suspended from a Flywheel?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the dynamics of a mass suspended from a flywheel, including linear acceleration, angular acceleration, tension in the rope, and friction torque. The linear acceleration was calculated to be approximately 2.45 m/s², leading to an angular acceleration of about 8.18 rad/s². The tension in the rope was determined to be 3.68 N, and initial calculations suggested no frictional torque. However, there was confusion regarding the use of the radius of gyration versus the radius in torque calculations, prompting further analysis and adjustments to the torque values. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using kinematic equations for linear acceleration when given distance and time.
SWINEFLU
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mass of 0.5kg is suspended from a flywheel, if the mass is released from rest and falls a distance of 0.5m in 1.5s calculate:

A, the Linear acceleration of the mass
B, the angular acceleration of the wheel
C, the tension in the rope
D, the friction torque.

Known information
Mass of wheel 3 kg Mp
Outside radius of wheel 0.3m
Radius of gyration 0.212 m

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



A,
mg - T = ma
TR=Ia/R
mg-(Ia/R^2) = ma
a= mg/(m+(I/R^2))
Swapping I out for I=(MpR^2)/2
gives
a=mg/(m+((MpR^2)/R^2)
a=mg/(m+(Mp/2)
a=2.4525
2.45 m/sec^-2

B,
Angular acceleration = a/R
2.4525/0.3 = 8.175
8.175 rads/sec^-2

C,
T=mg-ma
T=0.5*9.81-0.5*2.4525
T=3.68
3.68N

D, - The problem!
Torque (TNET) = acceleration torque (TA) + frictional torque (TF)
TF = TR
3.68*0.3
1.103625

TA = Angular acceleration*I
I = MpR^2/2
I = 3*0.3^2/2
I = 0.135
0.135*8.175
= 1.103625

Thus suggestion there is no frictional Torque,

I have spent a few weeks on an off with this question, I have looked at out threads on here, the lesson provided with the module and YOUTUBE. I am still not able to work out were I am going wrong, hope someone can help, Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Funny how posting that that prompted thought,

Should net torque use the radius of gyration instead of radius, thus giving a TNET of 0.779895, apply the same to the TA calculation it gives 0.551258
thus
TF = TNET - TA
TF = 0.228637

Or have I gone wrong further up the chain?
 
Hi SWINEFLU, Welcome to PF.

You have a problem with part A. You're looking for the linear acceleration of the mass and you're given distance and time, so why not avoid all the rotational motion involvement to begin with? Simple kinematics will yield the linear acceleration.
 
SWINEFLU said:
Funny how posting that that prompted thought,

Should net torque use the radius of gyration instead of radius, thus giving a TNET of 0.779895, apply the same to the TA calculation it gives 0.551258
thus
TF = TNET - TA
TF = 0.228637

Or have I gone wrong further up the chain?
The radius of gyration will let you compute the moment of inertia using the given mass of the wheel. What's the relationship between radius of gyration, moment of inertia, and mass? This should be one of your Relevant Equations.
 
gneill said:
Hi SWINEFLU, Welcome to PF.

You have a problem with part A. You're looking for the linear acceleration of the mass and you're given distance and time, so why not avoid all the rotational motion involvement to begin with? Simple kinematics will yield the linear acceleration.

Thanks gneill, I understand were you are coming from as this is what I have read online in several places, but surely the rotating of the mass of which the string is attached to affects the overall acceleration of the mass?
 
SWINEFLU said:
Thanks gneill, I understand were you are coming from as this is what I have read online in several places, but surely the rotating of the mass of which the string is attached to affects the overall acceleration of the mass?
It does, yes, but whatever affect it has results in the observed motion which is that the mass travels a given distance in a given time, hence a deducible acceleration (assuming linear motion and constant acceleration).
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K