How Do You Calculate the Dynamics of a Mass Suspended from a Flywheel?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass suspended from a flywheel, with specific parameters provided, including mass, radius, and distance fallen over time. The original poster attempts to calculate various dynamics, including linear and angular acceleration, tension in the rope, and friction torque.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between linear and angular motion, questioning the appropriate use of kinematics versus rotational dynamics. Some suggest reconsidering the use of the radius of gyration in calculations, while others point out potential simplifications in the approach to finding linear acceleration.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing guidance on simplifying the approach and questioning assumptions about the effects of rotational motion on linear acceleration. There is no explicit consensus on the correct method yet, as various interpretations and calculations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has expressed difficulty in resolving the problem after several attempts and has referenced external resources for assistance. There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of rotational dynamics on the overall motion of the mass.

SWINEFLU
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mass of 0.5kg is suspended from a flywheel, if the mass is released from rest and falls a distance of 0.5m in 1.5s calculate:

A, the Linear acceleration of the mass
B, the angular acceleration of the wheel
C, the tension in the rope
D, the friction torque.

Known information
Mass of wheel 3 kg Mp
Outside radius of wheel 0.3m
Radius of gyration 0.212 m

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



A,
mg - T = ma
TR=Ia/R
mg-(Ia/R^2) = ma
a= mg/(m+(I/R^2))
Swapping I out for I=(MpR^2)/2
gives
a=mg/(m+((MpR^2)/R^2)
a=mg/(m+(Mp/2)
a=2.4525
2.45 m/sec^-2

B,
Angular acceleration = a/R
2.4525/0.3 = 8.175
8.175 rads/sec^-2

C,
T=mg-ma
T=0.5*9.81-0.5*2.4525
T=3.68
3.68N

D, - The problem!
Torque (TNET) = acceleration torque (TA) + frictional torque (TF)
TF = TR
3.68*0.3
1.103625

TA = Angular acceleration*I
I = MpR^2/2
I = 3*0.3^2/2
I = 0.135
0.135*8.175
= 1.103625

Thus suggestion there is no frictional Torque,

I have spent a few weeks on an off with this question, I have looked at out threads on here, the lesson provided with the module and YOUTUBE. I am still not able to work out were I am going wrong, hope someone can help, Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Funny how posting that that prompted thought,

Should net torque use the radius of gyration instead of radius, thus giving a TNET of 0.779895, apply the same to the TA calculation it gives 0.551258
thus
TF = TNET - TA
TF = 0.228637

Or have I gone wrong further up the chain?
 
Hi SWINEFLU, Welcome to PF.

You have a problem with part A. You're looking for the linear acceleration of the mass and you're given distance and time, so why not avoid all the rotational motion involvement to begin with? Simple kinematics will yield the linear acceleration.
 
SWINEFLU said:
Funny how posting that that prompted thought,

Should net torque use the radius of gyration instead of radius, thus giving a TNET of 0.779895, apply the same to the TA calculation it gives 0.551258
thus
TF = TNET - TA
TF = 0.228637

Or have I gone wrong further up the chain?
The radius of gyration will let you compute the moment of inertia using the given mass of the wheel. What's the relationship between radius of gyration, moment of inertia, and mass? This should be one of your Relevant Equations.
 
gneill said:
Hi SWINEFLU, Welcome to PF.

You have a problem with part A. You're looking for the linear acceleration of the mass and you're given distance and time, so why not avoid all the rotational motion involvement to begin with? Simple kinematics will yield the linear acceleration.

Thanks gneill, I understand were you are coming from as this is what I have read online in several places, but surely the rotating of the mass of which the string is attached to affects the overall acceleration of the mass?
 
SWINEFLU said:
Thanks gneill, I understand were you are coming from as this is what I have read online in several places, but surely the rotating of the mass of which the string is attached to affects the overall acceleration of the mass?
It does, yes, but whatever affect it has results in the observed motion which is that the mass travels a given distance in a given time, hence a deducible acceleration (assuming linear motion and constant acceleration).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K