How Do You Calculate the Redox Potential for This Reaction?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the redox potential for the reaction Cr2(SO4)3 + 4K2SO4 + 3I2 + 7H2O <=> K2Cr2O7 + 6KI + 7H2SO4, the Nernst equation is used to determine the overall potential from half-cell reactions. The standard half-cell potentials for the reactions involving Cr(3+) and I2 must be referenced from a table to calculate the standard potential (Eo). The overall redox potential is not simply the sum of the individual potentials; it requires consideration of the number of electrons transferred and the concentrations of the ions involved. The discussion clarifies that "J" was a typo for iodine, which was historically represented as "J" in older literature. Understanding how to calculate Eo involves identifying the electron transfer between the chromium and iodine species.
vaazu
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have to calculate the redox potential of this equation:
Cr2(SO4)3 + 4K2SO4 + 3J2 +7H2O <=> K2Cr2O7 + 6KJ +7H2SO4
I used the nernst equation to calculate the potentials of
2Cr(3+)+7H2O -> Cr2O7(2-) +14H(+) +6e(-) and
I2 +2e(-) ->2J(-)
which were -1.42V and 0.51V, all ion concentrations were 0.1

Is the overall redox potential the sum of these potentials?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vaazu said:
1. Cr2(SO4)3 + 4K2SO4 + 3J2 +7H2O <=> K2Cr2O7 + 6KJ +7H2SO4
I used the nernst equation to calculate the potentials of
2Cr(3+)+7H2O -> Cr2O7(2-) +14H(+) +6e(-) and
I2 +2e(-) ->2J(-)
which were -1.42V and 0.51V, all ion concentrations were 0.1

Is the overall redox potential the sum of these potentials?


Are these J's typos, meaning I instead?

So you used the Nerst equation to calculate the half cell potentials? The Nerst equation is used to find the overall redox potential for the overall redox reaction, not half cell potential as implied here.

The standard half cell potentials for these half reactions are used (look up in a table) to calculate Eo, find the number of electrons transferred and use the 0.1 concentrations in the ions for the overall reaction.
 
eli64 said:
Are these J's typos, meaning I instead?

Interesting. J was iodine symbol up to around 1980, it is used this way in older books.

So you used the Nerst equation to calculate the half cell potentials? The Nerst equation is used to find the overall redox potential for the overall redox reaction, not half cell potential as implied here.

It works both ways.



 
eli64 said:
Are these J's typos, meaning I instead?

The standard half cell potentials for these half reactions are used (look up in a table) to calculate Eo, find the number of electrons transferred and use the 0.1 concentrations in the ions for the overall reaction.

Yes the J was typo, it should be I. Don´t know what was I thinking. Could you explain me, how the Eo is calculated, or what should I be looking for? Is the reaction standard potential calculated between the pair which actually exchanged electrons Cr(3+) and I2, or somehow between the chrome and iodide pairs.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top