How Do You Calculate the Time It Takes for a Block to Stop on a Sloped Ramp?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the time it takes for a block to stop sliding down a sloped ramp, starting with an initial speed and considering the effects of friction. The discussion centers around the application of Newton's laws and the forces acting on the block, including gravitational and frictional forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different frames of reference and the relationship between forces acting on the block. There are attempts to derive equations for acceleration and time, with some questioning the role of friction and the normal force. Others suggest simplifying the problem by using constant acceleration equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on identifying forces and drawing free body diagrams. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the components of forces and their directions, leading to further exploration of the problem setup.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty due to a lack of recent physics knowledge, while others emphasize the importance of correctly identifying angles and components in the context of the ramp's geometry.

ChEJosh
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block slides down a slope from point O with initial speed V. THe sliding coefficient, mu, brings the block to rest at time T. Using the ramp as the x-axis and the perpendicular as the y-axis, find T.

Homework Equations



F = ma
mu = mg sin(theta)
a=dv/dt

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm taking modern physics, and this is a problem to demonstrate how picking different frames of reference can change a problem. I have to take the axes as the vertical and horizontal after solving this part, butI haven't had general physics in about 3 years, so I'm just not sure how to do the easy part. I think if I get this part I can get the second, I just need a small refresher.

I was thinking somewhere along the lines of this:

ma = mg sin(theta) - mu
dv/dt = g sin(theta) - mu/m
dt = dv/(g sin(theta) - mu/m)

Maybe? But, I'm not sure how I should do that derivative.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChEJosh said:

Homework Equations



F = ma
That's the one.
mu = mg sin(theta)
mu is the coefficient of friction, so this makes no sense. How does friction relate to normal force?

What you need to do is identify all the forces acting on the block (draw a free body diagram!) and then apply Newton's 2nd law.
 
You're making it too complicated, just find the acceleration and use those old constant acceleration motion equations.
 
Doc Al said:
mu is the coefficient of friction, so this makes no sense. How does friction relate to normal force?

What you need to do is identify all the forces acting on the block (draw a free body diagram!) and then apply Newton's 2nd law.

I did draw a diagram. F = mu N yeah?
 
ChEJosh said:
I did draw a diagram. F = mu N yeah?
Yep. What's the normal force? Now find the net force parallel to the ramp.

As Feldoh says, keep it simple. (No need for calculus.)
 
N = mg cos(theta)

So,
a = g sin(theta) - mu g cos(theta)?

Then,
v = v_0 +at

Since we're looking at when it comes to rest, v=0

T = -v_0/a

Look right?
 
Looks good.
 
Excellent. Thank you.

For the second part, with the axes being the vertical and horizontal, I'm going to have a multi-component acceleration, yeah?

In the y-direction, the forces working is the weight/gravity which is pointing in the -y-direction, and components of the Normal and Friction pointing in the +y-direction.
For the x-direction, I'm going to have the normal in the positive x-direction, and the friction in the -x-direction.
Does that sound right?
 
Sounds good.
 
  • #10
For part a, I got
T = -v0/(g sin(theta) - mu g cos(theta)]

Obviously since it's the same situation, I should be able to get the same answer for part b, But I'm having difficulty.

x-direction
Fx = N cos() - mu N cos()
ax = [N cos() - mu N cos()]/m
T = -[v0x cos() m]/[N cos() - mu N cos()]

y-direction
Fy = mu N sin() + N sin() - mg sin()
ay = [mu N sin() + N sin() - mg sin()]\m
T = -[v0y sin() m]/[mu N sin() + N sin() - mg sin()]

theta is in all the empty (), of course.

And then, I'm stuck. I don't see how I could get the original answer from that, so either it's something I just haven't seen or I did something wrong.
 
  • #11
ChEJosh said:
x-direction
Fx = N cos() - mu N cos()
Check those components. They can't both be cosine. :wink:
 
  • #12
Doc Al said:
Check those components. They can't both be cosine. :wink:

No? I always thought that if it was an x component it was cosine, and y component was sine. Those are both the x components, so...
 
  • #13
ChEJosh said:
No? I always thought that if it was an x component it was cosine, and y component was sine. Those are both the x components, so...
Sure, if the angle is with respect to the x-axis. But theta is the angle of the ramp. What's the angle of the normal force?
 
  • #14
Doc Al said:
Sure, if the angle is with respect to the x-axis. But theta is the angle of the ramp. What's the angle of the normal force?
wrt the ramp 90º or wrt x-axis 90º+theta

How is the angle not wrt the x-axis? It's the angle made by the ramp with the x-axis
 
  • #15
ChEJosh said:
wrt the ramp 90º or wrt x-axis 90º+theta
That's with respect with the -x-axis, but OK. (What's the angle with the +x-axis?) In any case, you wrote cos(theta).
 
  • #16
Doc Al said:
That's with respect with the -x-axis, but OK. (What's the angle with the +x-axis?) In any case, you wrote cos(theta).

How is it the -x-axis?

Although, I now see that you're saying that the normal is theta from the positive y-axis, and needs to be sin(theta), right?
 
  • #17
Right.
 
  • #18
So now I get

x-direction
Fx = N sin() - mu N cos()
ax = [N sin() - mu N cos()]/m
T = -[v0x cos() m]/[N sin() - mu N cos()]

Substitute N = mg cos()

T = -[v0x cos() m]/[mg cos() sin() - mu mg cos() cos()]

cancel m cos() to arrive at original answer, right?

Thanks for all of your help.
 
  • #19
ChEJosh said:
cancel m cos() to arrive at original answer, right?
Looks good to me. (And you're welcome.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
985
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K