How Do You Calculate Uncertainty for a Perfect Straight Line?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating uncertainty in measurements for a graph that is described as a perfect straight line. The original poster is seeking clarification on how to address uncertainty when the data points appear to align perfectly along this line.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the validity of the assumption that a perfect straight line implies zero uncertainty. Some suggest that uncertainties should still be considered based on the measurements used to create the graph.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of uncertainty in the context of the original poster's experiment. Some guidance has been offered regarding the importance of considering measurement uncertainties, even when data points fit a straight line.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific experimental conditions, such as those related to Hooke's Law, which may influence how uncertainties are calculated and represented. The original poster's understanding of the assignment and the nature of the data is also under discussion.

leo037
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


My teacher assigned a lab report on an experiment where 2 graphs need to be drawn. One graph has some uncertainty which is calculated alright ((slope max - slope min) * 0.5) and the other graph still need to be drawn.. The values of the second graph make a perfect straight line which would make the uncertainty to be 0. how would you calculate the uncertainty?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there,

Are you absolutely sure that the graph make a perfect straight line. That would mean that all you experimental measures are precisely on the line. If so, from your experimental measures, you would have not uncertainty.
 
Just because the data points fit on a straight line does not mean that there was no uncertainty in the measurements.

You should have error boxes around each point, based on the uncertainties in the measurements of your variables.
 
Hi there,

These uncertainties are considered in the measurements of the points.

There is no added uncertainty to the plotting of the graph.

Cheers
 
Either I am not understanding this properly, or fatra knows more about the specific task you have been given.

Maybe you could shed some more light on the experiment that you are required to be writing up.

But consider an experiment on Hookes' Law:
You hang weights from a spring and measure the distance it stretches.

To find the spring constant of the spring, you can plot distance vs. weight and find the gradient. The uncertainty in your value for the spring constant can be found by the uncertainty in the gradient of the graph. This can be done as you have described above.

You will have uncertainty in the measurements of weight and in the measurements of distance. These values should allow you to set up error boxes around each point. It is using these boxes that can give you max and min gradient.

Your measured values might end up lying on a straight line - but this does not mean that there is no uncertainty in your measurements!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
7K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K