How Do You Construct a Matrix with a Specific Null Space?

Click For Summary
To construct a matrix with a null space consisting of all linear combinations of the vectors v1 = (1, -1, 3, 2) and v2 = (2, 0, -2, 4), the approach involves ensuring that the matrix A satisfies A * v1 = 0 and A * v2 = 0. The initial attempt at constructing a 4x4 matrix A was flawed because it did not satisfy the null space condition for both vectors. A simpler solution suggested is to use a 1x4 matrix that can be multiplied by a matrix formed from v1 and v2, resulting in a system of equations with two free variables. This method allows for flexibility in choosing values for the arbitrary variables while still maintaining the required null space.
mpittma1
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Construct a matrix whose null space consist of all linear combinations of:

v1 = (Column matrix) <1 -1 3 2>

v2 = (Column matrix) <2 0 -2 4>

Homework Equations



NS(A) = {x ε Rn I Ax =0}

w = k1v1 + k2v2

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure where to start with this problem.

I know that I'm looking for a 4 x 4 matrix and I'm only given 2 vectors to form "all linear combinations".

Do I need to first construct a matrix with 2 free variable columns showing the linear combination of the two given vectors, and then plug that into the null space equation and solve for the homogeneous system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I figured it out,

Let A = [a1a2a3a4]
[b1b2b3b4]

B = {(v1v2)}

then AB = [a1a2a3a4]
[b1b2b3b4]
* {(v1v2)} = [0 0]
[ 0 0]

Then I transpose BTAT

And the two vectors (a1a2a3a4)
(b1b2b3b4) have to be in the nullspace of BT

So all I have to do is find two vectors that span NS(BT)

So, BT = [1 -1 3 2] [1 0 1 -2]
[2 0 2-4] ≈ [0 1 -2 -4]

Then solving for my free variables,

x1 = 2x4 - x3
x2 = 2x3 + 4x4


2x4 - x3 -1 2
2x3 + 4x4 2 4
x = x3 = x3 1 + x4 0
x4 0 1

Hence,

∴ A = [-1 2 1 0]
[2 4 0 1] .

Any one care to confirm?
 
mpittma1 said:

Homework Statement



Construct a matrix whose null space consist of all linear combinations of:

v1 = (Column matrix) <1 -1 3 2>

v2 = (Column matrix) <2 0 -2 4>


Homework Equations



NS(A) = {x ε Rn I Ax =0}

w = k1v1 + k2v2


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure where to start with this problem.

I know that I'm looking for a 4 x 4 matrix and I'm only given 2 vectors to form "all linear combinations".

Do I need to first construct a matrix with 2 free variable columns showing the linear combination of the two given vectors, and then plug that into the null space equation and solve for the homogeneous system?

mpittma1 said:
I think I figured it out,

Let A = [a1a2a3a4]
[b1b2b3b4]

B = {(v1v2)}

then AB = [a1a2a3a4]
[b1b2b3b4]
* {(v1v2)} = [0 0]
[ 0 0]

Then I transpose BTAT

And the two vectors (a1a2a3a4)
(b1b2b3b4) have to be in the nullspace of BT

So all I have to do is find two vectors that span NS(BT)

So, BT = [1 -1 3 2] [1 0 1 -2]
[2 0 2-4] ≈ [0 1 -2 -4]

Then solving for my free variables,

x1 = 2x4 - x3
x2 = 2x3 + 4x4


2x4 - x3 -1 2
2x3 + 4x4 2 4
x = x3 = x3 1 + x4 0
x4 0 1

Hence,

∴ A = [-1 2 1 0]
[2 4 0 1] .

Any one care to confirm?


You have a mistake. For your matrix A, A * <1, -1, 3, 2>T = <0, 0>T, so that's fine, but A * <2, 0, -2, 4> = <-4, 8>T, which is not OK.

The simplest matrix that will work for you is a 1 X 4 matrix, like this:
$$A = \begin{bmatrix}a_1 & a_2 & a_3 & a_4 \end{bmatrix}$$

You could use it in this product:
$$\begin{bmatrix}a_1 & a_2 & a_3 & a_4 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ -1 & 0 \\ 3 & -2 \\ 2 & 4\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$$

This will give you two equations in four unknowns, which means that two of your variables are arbitrary (you can set them to whatever values you choose).
 
  • Like
Likes 2 people
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K