How Do You Convert CO2 PPMV in Air to PPMW in Water?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on converting CO2 concentration from parts per million by volume (PPMV) in air to parts per million by weight (PPMW) in water. The user is developing a device to measure dissolved CO2 in water and seeks a formula for this conversion. They initially struggled with the relationship between CO2 in air and water but found clarity through the Krichevsky-Kasarnovsky Equation and Henry's Law. The user emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying concepts rather than just obtaining a formula. Ultimately, they express gratitude for the guidance that helped them grasp the necessary calculations.
alwayslearning
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Measuring CO2

I have been searching for an answer to this for quite a while, so I'm hoping somebody here can help me out. I've spent quite a bit of time digging and reading, and I've found plenty of information, but I'm not always sure what to make of it. I am working on making myself a small electronic device to measure the dissolved CO2 in water in ppm by weight.

I'm going to make a small sealed chamber that will have an opening only to the water (but not to the atmosphere). The CO2 will off gas into the chamber until the concentration of CO2 in chamber becomes at equilibrium with the concentration in the water. I know that some of the CO2 will be converted into carbonic acid, but as I understand it, the majority of it will remain as CO2, and for the precision I'm going for I think I can just ignore that.

I'm going to place a small CO2 air sensor in the chamber that I will connect to a micro controller. The CO2 sensor reads concentration in ppmv. I'll also put a temperature sensor in there since I'm pretty sure I'll need to correct for temperature.

The problem I'm having is taking the ppm by volume and equating it to the concentration of CO2 in water, which needs to be reported in ppm by weight. I can't find a formula to do the conversion, and it's been so long since I took physics (I'm 37), so I'm completely unable to figure this out at this point.

Basically, I'm trying to figure out if it's V ppmv in the chamber, than what's the W ppmw in the water. Anybody have any ideas on how you'd calculate this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Google for Henry's law, and more specific, for Krichevsky-Kasarnovsky Equation, modeling the system CO2-H2O
 
What's funny is that when I read your comment my first thought was "of course I've already read that, why else would I be here?" Except I hadn't read into Krichevsky-Kasarnovsky Equation, so I went off and did that first. The part that was missing for me was the weight in water to volume in air relationship. In my search I found a document on the Krichevsky-Kasarnovsky Equation that explained this clearly. From there I went back to the parts I needed from Henry's law, which made more sense to me, and I was able to figure it out — even correcting for temperature!

So, thank you for your very simple answer! It was better than just getting a formula, because now I actually understand what the numbers mean.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top