How Do You Convert Milliseconds to 8.68 Microsecond Units for RPM Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wetmelon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units
AI Thread Summary
To convert milliseconds to 8.68 microsecond units for RPM calculations, 10 milliseconds equals 10,000 microseconds, which divides to approximately 1152 units of 8.68 microseconds. The program counts pulses over 10 milliseconds, where 6,000 RPM corresponds to one pulse, confirming the conversion is correct. A scalar of 6000 can be used to relate the number of pulses back to RPM, establishing a linear relationship. Thus, if one pulse is detected, it equates to 6,000 RPM, and two pulses would yield 12,000 RPM. The calculations and relationships discussed are accurate for the intended application.
Wetmelon
Messages
154
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I'm running a microcontroller that has me program times in 8.68microsecond units, and I'm having an issue converting 10ms to 8.68us units, then counting a number (scalar) then taking that number and getting RPMs from it.

Here's what I have so far:

10ms = 10,000us

10,000us/8.68 ~ 1152 (8.68us units) --> Is this right?

The program counts a number of pulses for 10ms, and returns that value, for example, in 10ms at 6,000 RPM I should see

6,000RPM = 100R/s (Hz) = 1R/10ms = 1 pulse

Then I want to convert from the one pulse back up to RPMs, so I need a scalar, I guess 6000 would be correct across all RPMs?


I feel like I've made a mistake here somewhere, but have I done this correctly?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A bit late, but in case someone else has a similar question:
Wetmelon said:
10,000us/8.68 ~ 1152 (8.68us units) --> Is this right?
To the nearest unit, yes.
Wetmelon said:
6,000RPM = 100R/s (Hz) = 1R/10ms = 1 pulse
That works for me.
Wetmelon said:
Then I want to convert from the one pulse back up to RPMs, so I need a scalar, I guess 6000 would be correct across all RPMs?
Yes, if I understand what you mean. There's a linear relationship between the number of pulses and the RPM, according to this formula: ##R(n_p) = 6000n_P##. If there is one pulse (##n_p = 1##), then R = 6000 (rev. per min). If there are two pulses, R = 12,000.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top