How Do You Determine the Minimum Rope Length Between Two Poles?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the minimum length of a rope connecting two vertical poles, with the rope extending from the top of one pole to a point on the ground and then to the top of the second pole. The original poster seeks to demonstrate that the shortest length occurs when the angles formed by the rope with the ground at each pole are equal.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of the length of the rope as a function of angles and the implications of its derivative. There are inquiries about identifying critical points and determining whether these points correspond to a minimum length. Some participants suggest analyzing the behavior of the derivative around these points.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their equations and derivatives while expressing confusion about the complexity of the expressions. There is a focus on maintaining the length in terms of angles, and some guidance has been provided regarding the differentiation process and critical points.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through a mix of variables and constants, with some expressing uncertainty about the clarity of their equations and the implications of their derivatives. The problem constraints and the requirement to prove a relationship between the angles are acknowledged but not resolved.

suspenc3
Messages
400
Reaction score
0
two vertical poles PQ and ST are secured by a rope PRS going from the top of the first pole to a Point R on the ground to the top of the second polle. Show that the shortest length of rope occurs when [tex]\theta_1=\theta_2[/tex]

I have found eqn and found the derivative, what do I do to show that it is a min?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Post a copy of your equation and the derivative. Your equation should show the length of the rope as a function of theta_1 (or theta_2 if you prefer, or whatever). For there to be a minimum length, the length equation will show that the length L starts at some value, then decreases some up to some point, and then increases from there to the end. If you think about drawing the function L as a funtion of theta (put L on the vertical and theta on the horizontal), the function L(theta) will look like a "U", right? When you differentiate L(theta) with respect to theta, what is special about the low point in the L(theta) curve? What can you say about the sign of the derivative for the first part of the U versus the end of the U? What must the derivative do at the bottom of the U as the sign of the derivative is changing from negative to positive?
 
suspenc3 said:
two vertical poles PQ and ST are secured by a rope PRS going from the top of the first pole to a Point R on the ground to the top of the second polle. Show that the shortest length of rope occurs when [tex]\theta_1=\theta_2[/tex]

I have found eqn and found the derivative, what do I do to show that it is a min?

Have you already found the critical points? The points where that make the first derivative zero or undefined. Then to show that there is a minimum at a critical point you can either evaluate the second derivative at that point and if it is positive then there is a minimum, or look at the value of the derivative on both sides of the critical point and if it is negative for values smaller than the the value of the critical point and positive for values larger then you have a minimum.
 
[tex]L_{tot}=L_1+L_2[/tex]
[tex]L=QRT, L_1=PR, L_2=RS, x=QR, \theta_1=PRQ, \theta_2=SRT[/tex]
[tex]x=L_1cos(\theta_1)[/tex]
[tex]L-x=L_2cos(\theta_2)[/tex]



so...[tex]\sqrt{(PQ)^2+x^2}=L_1[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{(ST)^2+(RT)^2}=L_2[/tex]

then find [tex]L_{tot}[/tex] and find the derivative..i find this even more confusing now
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I got lost there. I'd be inclined to keep L in terms of theta, as the problem is asking you to prove something about theta_1 and theta_2, so you'll have to end up there anyway. Can you maybe re-write the equations starting out something like:

[tex]Let L = QRT, l_1 = PR, l_2 = RS, x = QR, \theta_1 = PRQ, \theta_2 = SRT[/tex]

[tex]x = l_1 cos(\theta_1)[/tex]

[tex]L - x = l_2 cos(\theta_2)[/tex]

[tex]l_total = l_1 + l_2 = ...[/tex]
 
i edited my above, i find this more confusing now though
 
suspenc3 said:
i edited my above, i find this more confusing now though
Well, maybe it -- sorry if it is. But go ahead and solve it anyway. Change RT --> L-x, do the addition and differentiation, set to zero and solve for x. Hopefully L and PQ and ST will fall out of the equations...
 
so my derivative is:

[tex]l_{tot}= \frac{x}{\sqrt{P^2Q^2+x^2}}+\frac{-1+x}{\sqrt{S^2T^2+L^2-2Lx+x^2}}[/tex]..now i just solve for x?

yyyyyyeah..there's a ton of letters, I don't think they are all going to cancel out.
 
Last edited:
That's not Ltot, it's the derivative of Ltot with respect to x (well except for a couple factor of 2 issues). So it is L'tot, and you would set that equal to zero to find out what the x value is for the minimum, and then figure out the angles from the x. I agree it looks messy at the moment -- maybe there's an easier formulation...
 
  • #10
suspenc3 said:
so my derivative is:

[tex]l_{tot}= \frac{x}{\sqrt{P^2Q^2+x^2}}+\frac{-1+x}{\sqrt{S^2T^2+L^2-2Lx+x^2}}[/tex]..now i just solve for x?

yyyyyyeah..there's a ton of letters, I don't think they are all going to cancel out.
P, Q, S and T are not variables. You can't separate P & Q and write PQ^2 = P^2Q^2 - that is meaningless.

So what you should have is:
[tex]dl_{tot}/dt = \frac{x}{\sqrt{PQ^2+x^2}}+\frac{-L+x}{\sqrt{ST^2+(L-x)^2}} = 0[/tex]

[tex]\implies \frac{x}{\sqrt{PQ^2+x^2}} = \frac{L-x}{\sqrt{ST^2+(L-x)^2}}[/tex]

Square both sides (don't bother expanding the square of (L-x)) and cross multiply...and answer pops out in hardly a couple of steps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K