How Do You Differentiate Between Pure and Applied Mathematics and Start a Proof?

AI Thread Summary
Pure mathematics focuses on theoretical concepts, proofs, and theorems, while applied mathematics emphasizes real-world applications, computations, and modeling. Graduate curricula for both fields share similarities, but applied mathematics students typically engage more with differential equations and statistics, whereas pure mathematics students concentrate on algebra and topology. Starting a proof can be challenging, but familiarity with exercises and patterns in mathematics can help. Engaging with various problems and exercises allows one to identify potential directions for proofs, making the process easier over time.
michaelknight
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello, all :) I was just wondering a few things:
1) what is the difference between pure mathematics and applied mathematics, and which classes do you need to take in order to get your Ph.D. in either subject?
2) I know this is a really large branch off, but I was wondering how do you start a proof? When I do proofs, the beginning is always the hardest part for me, but when I get going, I can do proofs fairly easily. I guess what I'm asking is how do you pick the subject for the proof, and then proceed from there?

Thank you for anyone who is willing to help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My understanding is that pure mathematics deals more with proofs and theorems, and applied mathematics deals more with computations and modeling, i.e. real world applications.

I don't know about doctoral curricula, but my grad school research suggests that MS students in applied and pure math largely study similar things, with the applied mathematics students spending more time on differential equations and/or statistics/probability-type courses than the pure math students, who seem to do more algebra and topology.
 
Applied mathematics is generally about actual numbers, and in pure mathematics the numbers are largely irrelevant. It's more about the properties.

For example, applied mathematics might have you either computing the tension on an anchor from two strings, or perhaps trying to find such an equation. Pure mathematics would be examining how many ways you can screw with a matrix and still get useful information from it, or perhaps how you can take two separate bits of math (say calculus and matrices) and stick them together and do calculus on matrices. So pure math is more about what kind of math can you do and applied is more about finding the physical answers.

The beginning is always the hardest part of a proof. You just have to do so many that you can kind of tell in the beginning what direction to go in.

I found a lot of interesting properties of groups when I was doing the exercises in my algebra book. Exercises are a great place to start, because they give you something to do with the math. The more you move the math around, the more you see how it moves, and you can start to see little patterns, and then you say "I wonder if this is ALWAYS true?". You can find lots of books of exercises for any branch of math.
 
guys i am currently studying in computer science engineering [1st yr]. i was intrested in physics when i was in high school. due to some circumstances i chose computer science engineering degree. so i want to incoporate computer science engineering with physics and i came across computational physics. i am intrested studying it but i dont know where to start. can you guys reccomend me some yt channels or some free courses or some other way to learn the computational physics.
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top