How Do You Find a First Integral for a Mechanics Problem ODE?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Motion
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a first integral for a specific ordinary differential equation (ODE) related to a mechanics problem involving two masses and a potential. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the approach to take, particularly regarding coordinate transformations and the integration of the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods for finding a first integral, including multiplying the equation by velocity and integrating. There are questions about the physical significance of the derived equation and its interpretation in the context of the mechanics problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the physical implications of the mathematical results. Some participants have provided guidance on potential methods for integration, while others are exploring the physical context of the problem, including the behavior of the masses involved.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of assumptions regarding the nature of the forces involved and the behavior of the system, particularly concerning the potential energy and the implications of certain parameters being zero. The original poster also notes the complexity of the physical scenario, which involves a mass on a table and another hanging below, leading to questions about the system's dynamics.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I have found the following ODE in the context of a mechanics problem and am now asked to find a first integral of this equation.

(m_1+m_2)\ddot{r}-m_1Cr^{-3}+m_2g=0

I know this means that I'm supposed to find an equation of the form F(\dot{r},r)=\mbox{const.} but I don't know how to achieve that.

Am I expected to guess a coordinate transformation whose associated constant of the motion (in the sense of Noether's theorem) is of the form F(\dot{r},r)=\mbox{const.}? Or is there a more direct approach? Certainly the equation cannot be integrated directly because what's \int r^{-3}dt??

Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Multiply the equation by \dot r, then integrate.

That "trick" works for almost all the 2nd order dynamics equations that turn up in textbook and exam questions.
 
Thanks for the tip! :-p
 
I have found the first inetegral of the motion; it is

\frac{1}{2}(m_1+m_2)\dot{r}^2+\frac{m_1C}{2}r^{-2}+m_2gr=\mbox{const.}

and I am now asked to give its physical significance.

My best shot was to remark that the equation above is an equation of energy conservation for a mass m_1+m_2 free to move in one dimension and subject to move in a ficticious potential 'V'(r)= \frac{m_1C}{2}r^{-2}+m_2gr. But I'm thinking, maybe this is too mathematical and not enough physical?

Otherwise, how can the equation be interpreted physically?
 
Mmmh, this potential is dubious too because it won't let r go to zero*... but the actual problem is that of a table with a hole in it and two masses linked by a rope passing through the hole in the table, such that one mass slides w/o friction on the table and the other is hanging in the air below it.

This kinds of baffles physical intuition doesn't it? Instead of the mass spiraling towards the hole, the mass on the table will behave like a kind of planet orbiting the hole... This doesn't make sense; I can't imagine that the mass hanging in the air will ever lift up! *unless C is zero, which corresponds to a null initial angular velocity according to my previous calculations, so this makes sense
 
From the description of the physical problem it should be clear what
\frac{1}{2}(m_1+m_2)\dot{r}^2
and
m_2gr
represent (they are both energies).

You didn't give the full question, but if it involves the mass on the table "orbiting" round the hole, shouldn't there be some theta terms in the equations of motion?

OTOH if C = 0, you don't need to explain what a zero term represents!
 
Last edited:
Indeed there initially were two coupled equations of motion, but I was able to uncouple them by showing that the second one meant

\dot{\phi}^2=Cr^{-4}

Then inject that in the first to get the equation of post #1.
 
So the discussion in this thread is really advanced and here I come with a simple question:

say we have the system

x' = x
y' = y

How do we find a first integral for this?

I know that f(x) = e^x and f(y) = e^y are solutions for this system...

But I have no idea where to start with this..
 
well, formally one can divide the two equations

dx/dy=x/y,

so dx/x=dy/y, yielding ln(abs(x/y))=const.

HOWEVER, a first integral should be a continuous function, and the above isn't.
Intuitively, your equations describe a source at x=y=0, and therefore phase volumes grow in time (i.e. there is no conserved quantity that is continuous and is not constant on an open subset of the x-y plane).

Mathador
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K