- #1

- 57

- 0

^topic

- Thread starter joebohr
- Start date

- #1

- 57

- 0

^topic

- #2

rock.freak667

Homework Helper

- 6,230

- 31

What are limits of the region you need to get the area of?

- #3

- 57

- 0

Just, what is the general process for finding the area? Say for a=3.

- #4

I like Serena

Homework Helper

- 6,577

- 176

Rewrite your equation to the form y=f(x) and take the integral.

- #5

- 371

- 0

^topic

I'll assume your limits are 1 and e.

[tex]xy=a[/tex]

[tex]y=\frac{a}{x}[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{Area under the curve}=\int\limits_{1}^{e}\frac{a}{x}\mbox{d}x[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{Area under the curve}=a\left(\mbox{ln}(e)-\mbox{ln}(1)\right)[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{Area under the curve}=a(1-0)[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{Area}=a[/tex]

- #6

- 57

- 0

I'll assume your limits are 1 and e.

[tex]xy=a[/tex]

[tex]y=\frac{a}{x}[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{Area under the curve}=\int\limits_{1}^{e}\frac{a}{x}\mbox{d}x[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{Area under the curve}=a\left(\mbox{ln}(e)-\mbox{ln}(1)\right)[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{Area under the curve}=a(1-0)[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{Area}=a[/tex]

Perhaps I should have specified. I knew how to find the are under the curve from a to b, where a is not equal to zero, but wanted to find the area of the curve in either the 1st or 3rd quadrant (that is, from 0 to b or from -b to 0).

- #7

- 371

- 0

Is the a you are talking about the same as the a in xy=a?Perhaps I should have specified. I knew how to find the are under the curve from a to b, where a is not equal to zero, but wanted to find the area of the curve in either the 1st or 3rd quadrant (that is, from 0 to b or from -b to 0).

- #8

- 57

- 0

Nope, sorry about that, I should have used different variables. The second a (as in from a to b) just represents that I wasn't asking about the integral from c to b where c≠0 and was concerned with the integral from 0 to b.Is the a you are talking about the same as the a in xy=a?

- #9

- 371

- 0

Ok. So,Nope, sorry about that, I should have used different variables. The second a (as in from a to b) just represents that I wasn't asking about the integral from c to b where c≠0 and was concerned with the integral from 0 to b.

[tex]\mbox{Area under the curve}=\int_{c}^{b}\frac{a}{x}\mbox{d}x[/tex]

[tex] \mbox{Area under the curve}= a \left(\mbox{ln} |b|-\mbox{ln} |c| \right) [/tex]

- #10

- 57

- 0

Right, as I said I got this result when I tried myself. But I wanted to know what to do when c=0.Ok. So,

[tex]\mbox{Area under the curve}=\int_{c}^{b}\frac{a}{x}\mbox{d}x[/tex]

[tex] \mbox{Area under the curve}= a \left(\mbox{ln} |b|-\mbox{ln} |c| \right) [/tex]

- #11

- 371

- 0

The area is infinite because ln(0)= -∞Right, as I said I got this result when I tried myself. But I wanted to know what to do when c=0.

- #12

- 57

- 0

That's the problem, and it's what made me think I needed a new approach. Because obviously a hyperbola in the 1st quadrant doesn't have infinite area as it has asymptotes at the x and y axis. Is there perhaps another way to figure this out?The area is infinite because ln(0)= -∞

- #13

I like Serena

Homework Helper

- 6,577

- 176

Nope. The hyperbola in the 1st quadrant does have an infinite area.That's the problem, and it's what made me think I needed a new approach. Because obviously a hyperbola in the 1st quadrant doesn't have infinite area as it has asymptotes at the x and y axis. Is there perhaps another way to figure this out?

What makes you think that it doesn't?

- #14

- 57

- 0

- #15

I like Serena

Homework Helper

- 6,577

- 176

I can give you 2 examples that demonstrate the difference and the method how to calculate it (integration).

Example 1: x^2 y = 1

The corresponding area from x=1 to x=infinity is:

[tex]\textit{Area-from-1} = \int_1^\infty {1 \over x^2} dx = \left( - {1 \over x} \right) \large|_1^\infty = 1[/tex]

This is, as you can see, a finite value of only 1.

Example 2: x y = 1

The corresponding area from x=1 to x=infinity is:

[tex]\textit{Area-from-1} = \int_1^\infty {1 \over x} dx = \left( \ln x \right) \large|_1^\infty = \infty[/tex]

As you can see, this is not a finite value.

- #16

- 57

- 0

[itex]\int[/itex][itex]^{\infty}_{1}[/itex][itex]\frac{1}{x}[/itex]dx[itex]\equiv[/itex]-ln(1)+[itex]lim_{x->{\infty}}[/itex]ln(x)=0

?

Also, are there any clever approximations for this area? Would translating the figure into say (x-3)(y-3)=a make any difference (no more singularity)? How would I find the area under a different type of hyperbola (is there a method that works for all hyperbolas that aren't in the form xy=1)? Thanks.

- #17

I like Serena

Homework Helper

- 6,577

- 176

I'm afraid not. Your limit approaches infinity instead of 0.

- #18

- 57

- 0

Yeah, your right, but Wolfram was giving me a different result a minute ago, or maybe I made a typing mistake. Anyway, can you help with my other questions (sorry for so many)? There has to be some way to approximate it, especially considering that the hyperbola all but approaches the axes at an upper limit of 10*a.I'm afraid not. Your limit approaches infinity instead of 0.

- #19

I like Serena

Homework Helper

- 6,577

- 176

Which questions?Yeah, your right, but Wolfram was giving me a different result a minute ago, or maybe I made a typing mistake. Anyway, can you help with my other questions (sorry for so many)?

The questions I see, have already been answered by dimension10.

He did not make any mistakes.

- #20

- 57

- 0

These questions, you may not have noticed them because they were on the first page. Thank you for clearing up the first matter, I did not mean to imply that anyone other than myself was making a mistake.Also, are there any clever approximations for this area? Would translating the figure into say (x-3)(y-3)=a make any difference (no more singularity)? How would I find the area under a different type of hyperbola (is there a method that works for all hyperbolas that aren't in the form xy=1)? Thanks.

- #21

I like Serena

Homework Helper

- 6,577

- 176

Clever approximations? The area is infinite. What's there to approximate?

[itex]\int[/itex][itex]^{\infty}_{1}[/itex][itex]\frac{1}{x}[/itex]dx[itex]\equiv[/itex]-ln(1)+[itex]lim_{x->{\infty}}[/itex]ln(x)=0

?

Also, are there any clever approximations for this area? Would translating the figure into say (x-3)(y-3)=a make any difference (no more singularity)? How would I find the area under a different type of hyperbola (is there a method that works for all hyperbolas that aren't in the form xy=1)? Thanks.

Or do you mean an approximation for the natural logarithm for some value?

The translation you mention shifts the singularity to x=3, meaning there is still a singularity at x=3, and anyway, integrating to +infinity still yields infinity.

You can rotate the hyperbola.

The classical hyperbola formula is [itex]{x^2 \over a^2} - {y^2 \over b^2}=1[/itex].

But if you integrate between the axes and the hyperbola you'll still get infinity.

- #22

- 57

- 0

Anyway, for approximation methods I have a few ideas, would any of them work? They are as follows:

- cut off the area above some point on the x and y axis (say 10a)

- use a series expansion and take the limit of that instead of ln (you could have it approach 10a if necessary)

- integrate from some number sufficiently close to 0 instead of 0

Any thoughts?

- #23

I like Serena

Homework Helper

- 6,577

- 176

If you make a series expansion instead of ln, you'll approximate the same result (if the series is convergent).

If you integrate from some number close to 0, you'll get a large value.

The closer the number is to 0, the closer the result is to infinity.

- #24

- 57

- 0

- #25

I like Serena

Homework Helper

- 6,577

- 176

But the best approximation for a finite part of the area is the natural logarithm.

If you want to do it for a different hyperbola formula, first you need to define which part of the area you want to know, and then you can set up a formula for that part (as long as that part is finite).

If you want you can set it up in polar coordinates:

r=L/(1-e cos theta)

This is useful if you want to use Kepler's 2rd law, that says the area a mass sweeps per unit of time, is constant.

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 4K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 492

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 617

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 586

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 2K