How Do You Prove That g Equals f^-1 Given Composition Identities?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the function g is the inverse of the function f, given the composition identities (g ∘ f)(x) = x for all x in D(f) and (f ∘ g)(y) = y for all y in D(g). The subject area is primarily focused on function composition and properties of inverse functions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the composition identities and question how to formally prove that g equals f^-1. Some participants discuss the definitions of inverse functions and the conditions under which they hold true. Others express uncertainty about proving definitions and whether they are inherently true.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their thoughts on the definitions and implications of the problem. Some have attempted to outline a proof based on the properties of bijections, while others are questioning the nature of definitions and their proofs. There is no explicit consensus, but various interpretations and approaches are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the definitions and properties of functions, particularly focusing on the conditions necessary for a function to be considered an inverse. There is an underlying assumption that f and g are bijective functions, which is crucial for the discussion.

Punkyc7
Messages
415
Reaction score
0
Let f and g be functions such that (g[itex]\circ[/itex]f)(x)=x for all x [itex]\epsilon[/itex]D(f) and (f[itex]\circ[/itex]g)(y)=y for all y [itex]\epsilon[/itex]D(g). Prove that a g = f^-1

Pf/

How would you go about starting this besides saying

Let f and g be functions such that (g[itex]\circ[/itex]f)(x)=x for all x [itex]\epsilon[/itex]D(f) and (f[itex]\circ[/itex]g)(y)=y for all y [itex]\epsilon[/itex]D(g).

isn't obvious that the functions would have to be the inverse of each other, How else could you get the identity? So how do you prove it, can I just say clearly it is.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What does g = f^-1 mean? My calc text gives this definition:

g = f^-1 if, and only if, f(x) is a one-to-one function with domain D(f) and range D(g) such that

g(y)=x <=> f(x)=y for all y in D(g).

Start with the given and prove this definition must be true.
 
g= f^-1 means that g is the inverse of f
 
How do you prove a definition true. If its a definition shouldn't it always be true?
 
This is what I have been able to get to

(g[itex]\circ[/itex]f)(x)=x for all x ϵD(f) and (f[itex]\circ[/itex]g)(y)=y for all y ϵD(g).So choose
g(y)=x and f(x)=y

so

x=g(y)=f^-1(y)

ans since f and g are bijections we can conclude g=f^-1does that work
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K