How Do You Rotate a Complex Number by 270 Degrees?

Click For Summary
Multiplying a complex number (a + bi) by -i results in a 270-degree counterclockwise rotation, as the argument of -i is 270 degrees. To achieve rotations of other degrees, one can multiply (a + bi) by i raised to the appropriate power: i^1 for 90 degrees, i^2 for 180 degrees, and i^3 for 270 degrees. The discussion emphasizes the use of Euler's formula, which relates the arguments of complex numbers and their products, allowing for rotations by any degree. Additionally, converting degrees to radians is necessary when applying Euler's formula for rotations. Understanding these concepts provides a foundation for manipulating complex numbers in geometric transformations.
Rade

Question, in order to produce a 270 degree geometric rotation of the complex number (a + bi), would this be correct:
(a + bi) * (-i)
It seems logical since a 90 degree rotation results from (a + bi) * (i)
Next question. What would be the equations for rotation of (a + bi) by 45 degrees, 135 degrees, 225 degrees ?
Thanks for help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hypermorphism said:
Do you know the Euler formula ?
Is it standard here in the math section of the forum to answer a question with a question ?
 
You can either think of complex numbers as vectors and hence use a suitable transformation matrix, or you can think about their arguments (i.e. the angles they make with the +ve real line).

So, yes, multiplication by -i will rotate a complex number by 270 deg (in the anticlockwise direction), since the argument of -i is 270, and when you multiply complex numbers you add their arguments. This is what hypermorphism was hinting at: Euler's formula can prove this. Since if z=a+ib and w=c+id are two complex numbers with arguments p and q, then z=|z|e^(ip) and w=|w|e^(iq), and hence zw=|wz|e^(i(p+q)).

So in the spirit of the standard of answering a question with a question:
Can you see how to apply this to rotations of any degree? :smile:
 
devious_ said:
You can either think of complex numbers as vectors and hence use a suitable transformation matrix, or you can think about their arguments (i.e. the angles they make with the +ve real line).
So, yes, multiplication by -i will rotate a complex number by 270 deg (in the anticlockwise direction), since the argument of -i is 270, and when you multiply complex numbers you add their arguments. This is what hypermorphism was hinting at: Euler's formula can prove this. Since if z=a+ib and w=c+id are two complex numbers with arguments p and q, then z=|z|e^(ip) and w=|w|e^(iq), and hence zw=|wz|e^(i(p+q)).
So in the spirit of the standard of answering a question with a question:
Can you see how to apply this to rotations of any degree? :smile:
Thanks for your help. I am not a mathematician--obvious from the question--since the answer ends up being basic. I see the degree rotations (0 to 360) of a complex number (a + bi) when operated on by i being related to raising (i) to various powers, thus (a + bi) * i ^ 1 = 90 degree rotation, * i ^ 2 180 degrees, * i ^ 3 270 degrees, * i ^ 4 360 (or 0 degrees). To find any single degree rotation one must find the correct power of i by which (a + bi) is multiplied,--so, is there a Table of Powers of i that give all 360 degrees--perhaps an internet link ?
 
As devious_ mentioned (and what follows from Euler), the argument of the product of two complex numbers is the sum of their arguments*. So if you want to rotate by x degrees, you'd want to multiply by a number whose argument is x degrees. The argument of e^{ix} is x radians*, and it's absolute value is 1 (the absolute value needs to be 1 if you just want a rotation). Convert degrees to radians, and use Euler's if you want to get in a+bi form.*modulo the multivalued nature of the argument, i.e. up to multiples of 2*pi
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K