How Do You Solve for x1 and x2 Using Reduced Row Echelon Form?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zekester
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Echelon Form Row
AI Thread Summary
To solve for x1 and x2 using reduced row echelon form, the equations derived are x1 + x2 = -27.5, x3 = -13.5, and x4 = 15. The relationship between x1 and x2 reveals that one variable depends on the other, specifically x1 = -x2 - 27.5. By substituting values, it is determined that x2 = -41 and consequently x1 = 14.5. This demonstrates the effectiveness of reduced row echelon form in simplifying linear equations for clear solutions.
zekester
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
i have a matrix in reduced row echelon form and it gives me the equations
x1+x2=-27.5, x3=-13.5, and x4 = 15. how do i solve for x1 and x2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All you can say about x1 and x2 is that x1 = -x2 - 27.5 (or x2 = -x1 - 27.5). That is to say, one of the variable depends entirely on the other. So the general solution for x is that x is any vector whose components (x1, x2, x3, x4) are such that x1 = -x2 - 27.5, x2 = x2 (i.e. any real number) , x3=-13.5, and x4 = 15.
 


Reduced row echelon form is a useful tool in solving systems of linear equations. In your case, the reduced row echelon form of your matrix has already simplified the system into three equations, with x1 and x2 as the variables. This means that the solution to the system can be found by plugging in the given values for x3 and x4 into the equations and solving for x1 and x2.

To solve for x1 and x2, you can use the elimination method by adding or subtracting the equations to eliminate one of the variables. For example, by adding the first equation (x1 + x2 = -27.5) to the second equation (x3 = -13.5), we can eliminate x1 and solve for x2. This gives us x2 = -41.

Then, we can substitute this value of x2 into the first equation (x1 + x2 = -27.5) to solve for x1. This gives us x1 = 14.5.

Therefore, the solution to the system is x1 = 14.5 and x2 = -41. This shows that the reduced row echelon form has simplified the system into a form that is easier to solve and provides a clear solution for the variables.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top