How Do You Solve Tension and Acceleration in a Two-Pulley System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter astronomerc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulleys Two masses
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a two-pulley system with two blocks connected by a rope. Participants are tasked with determining the tension in the rope and the acceleration of each block, noting that the blocks do not have the same acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to analyze the forces acting on each block and derives equations for tension and acceleration. They express uncertainty about their algebra and logic, particularly regarding the variable u, which represents friction.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the assumptions made in the problem, particularly regarding the presence of friction. Some suggest that unless stated, surfaces should be considered frictionless. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach to finding u or the next steps in the solution process.

Contextual Notes

There is ambiguity regarding the variable u, which is not provided in the problem statement. Participants are questioning the implications of assuming friction and how it affects their calculations.

astronomerc
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two blocks are connected by a rope that passes around two pulleys as indicated in the figure. (Attached)

a. Determine the tension in the rope.
b. Determine the acceleration of each block (Hint: The two blocks do not have the same acceleration).

The Attempt at a Solution



I call m1 the left mass and m2 the right.
I think the Tension is the same for the whole rope.
My m1 free body has normal up (+y) weight down, kinetic friction left, Tension right (+x)
My m2 free body is 2T up (-y) and weight down.
I think a1=2a2

For m1x Fx=max
T-f=m1a
T=2ma2+um1g

For m2:
m2g-2T=m2a2
T=(m2g-m2a2)/2

I put my two equations together to eliminate T
4m1a2+2um1g=m2g-m2a2

I solved for a2
a2=(m2g-2um1g)/(4m1+m2)

I plugged what I had for a2 into the original to solve for u:

I ended up with m2g-2um1g-m2g=2um1g
everything cancels to -u=u

Can someone please point out my flaw, be it in my algebra or my logic?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
astronomerc said:
I solved for a2
a2=(m2g-2um1g)/(4m1+m2)
Everything up to here looks fine.

I plugged what I had for a2 into the original to solve for u:

I ended up with m2g-2um1g-m2g=2um1g
But I don't understand what you are trying to do here. I presume u is given, just like the two masses.

You found a2, now find a1 and T.
 
u is not given. The problem in it's entirety is posted... I am struggling to find u, but think I can do the rest from there.

I thought about assuming u was zero, but that doesn't seem right either.
 
astronomerc said:
u is not given. The problem in it's entirety is posted... I am struggling to find u, but think I can do the rest from there.

I thought about assuming u was zero, but that doesn't seem right either.
It sounds like you are just assuming that there's friction. I see no mention of it in the problem statement that you gave.

In general, unless the problem explicitly mentions friction, assume that all surfaces are frictionless. (If not, there's not enough information to solve the problem.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K