How Do You Solve This High Pass Filter ODE Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brad sue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Signals System
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a high pass filter ordinary differential equation (ODE) related to signal processing. Participants explore the mathematical formulation and integration techniques necessary to express the output signal in terms of the input signal.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the ODE of the high pass filter and the initial solution involving the derivative of the input signal, seeking to express the output as an integral of the input signal instead.
  • Another participant suggests that the variable t in the integral can be treated as a constant, allowing for simplification of the exponential term.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of maintaining the form of the argument as t - λ, asserting that t is a constant during integration.
  • A participant notes that the integral relates to the frequency domain, highlighting the distinction between time-domain and frequency-domain representations.
  • One participant expresses intent to redo their computations based on feedback received, indicating ongoing uncertainty in their approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of the variable t in the integral and the implications of maintaining the form of the argument. There is no consensus on the best approach to resolve the problem, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for integration by parts and the implications of using the delta function in the context of impulse response, but the specific mathematical steps and assumptions remain unresolved.

brad sue
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have this problem about signals that I have a little trouble to finish:
I attached a small figure of the circuit.
I cannot figure out the answer and I struggled for 2 days.

It is a High pass filter, and the ODE of the circuit is:

[tex]\frac{dx[t]}{dt}=\frac{y[t]}{RC}+ \frac{dy[t]}{dt}[/tex]

the solution for the equation is (according to the hint given by the homework):
[tex]y[t]=\int_{-\infty}^{t} e^{-(t-\lambda)/\tau}x'[\lambda] \,d\lambda[/tex] (1)

But the question said:
Find the solution of the ODE to obtain y[t] as some integral of x[t].

This implies taking away the [tex]x'[\lambda][/tex] in (1) and replace by [tex]x[\lambda][/tex].

the hint suggested us to use the integration by part to the solution [tex]y[t][/tex].
I chose x'[t] for v' and the exponetial function as u.
[tex]\int_{a}^{b}u.v'd\lambda =[u.v] -\int_{a}^{b}u'. vd\lambda[/tex]


Doing this, I got:
[tex]y[t]=x[t]+\lambda\int_{-\infty}^{t}x(\lambda)e^{-(t-\lambda)/\tau} \,d\lambda[/tex]

My problem is that by intergrating, even though I took away what I wanted, I have introduced the variable t. I don't know if it is a problem. I am not sure of the answer.

My second question is the following:
Find the impulse response function [tex]h[t][/tex] so that the solution is has the form:
[tex]y[t]=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}h(t-\lambda) x(\lambda) \,d\lambda[/tex]

Hint: if you find a lonely x(t), remenber that: [tex]x[t]=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\delta(t-\lambda) x(\lambda) \,d\lambda[/tex]

[tex]\delta(t)[/tex] is the delta function.


please can I have help with this problem?
Thank you
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
brad sue said:
Hi,

I have this problem about signals that I have a little trouble to finish:
I attached a small figure of the circuit.
I cannot figure out the answer and I struggled for 2 days.

It is a High pass filter, and the ODE of the circuit is:

[tex]\frac{dx[t]}{dt}=\frac{y[t]}{RC}+ \frac{dy[t]}{dt}[/tex]

the solution for the equation is (according to the hint given by the homework):
[tex]y[t]=\int_{-\infty}^{t} e^{-(t-\lambda)/\tau}x'[\lambda] \,d\lambda[/tex] (1)

But the question said:
Find the solution of the ODE to obtain y[t] as some integral of x[t].

This implies taking away the [tex]x'[\lambda][/tex] in (1) and replace by [tex]x[\lambda][/tex].

the hint suggested us to use the integration by part to the solution [tex]y[t][/tex].
I chose x'[t] for v' and the exponetial function as u.
[tex]\int_{a}^{b}u.v'd\lambda =[u.v] -\int_{a}^{b}u'. vd\lambda[/tex]


Doing this, I got:
[tex]y[t]=x[t]+\lambda\int_{-\infty}^{t}x(\lambda)e^{-(t-\lambda)/\tau} \,d\lambda[/tex]

My problem is that by intergrating, even though I took away what I wanted, I have introduced the variable t. I don't know if it is a problem. I am not sure of the answer.

My second question is the following:
Find the impulse response function [tex]h[t][/tex] so that the solution is has the form:
[tex]y[t]=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}h(t-\lambda) x(\lambda) \,d\lambda[/tex]

Hint: if you find a lonely x(t), remenber that: [tex]x[t]=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\delta(t-\lambda) x(\lambda) \,d\lambda[/tex]

[tex]\delta(t)[/tex] is the delta function.


please can I have help with this problem?
Thank you

In the integral t is not a variable, it is a constant, since the integration variable is lambda. You can make [tex]e^{-(t-\lambda)} = e^{-t}e^\lambda[/tex] then take [tex]e^{-t}[/tex] outside of the integral.
 
Thank you CEL but I think that I need to keep the form so that I always get the [tex]t-\lambda[/tex] as argument.
 
brad sue said:
Thank you CEL but I think that I need to keep the form so that I always get the [tex]t-\lambda[/tex] as argument.

Even if you want to keep the form [tex]t-\lambda[/tex], t is still a constant and not a variable. The only variable is still [tex]\lambda[/tex] .
 
When one does

[tex]y[t]=\int_{-\infty}^{t} e^{-(t-\lambda)/\tau}x'[\lambda] \,d\lambda[/tex]

the integral involves the frequency domain, and lambda (frequency) is the variable, not t.

Frquency domain is the basis of Fourier and Laplace transforms and analyses, as opposed to the time-domain.

If x(t) = eat, then x'(t) = a eat = a x(t) assuming that x'(t) = d x(t) / dt

and the other part of that is d [x(t)]/da = t eat = t x(t)
 
Last edited:
Thank you Astronuc and CEL,

I 'll redo my computations. I will let you know if I still have an issue.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K