MHB How Does a 1% Increase in Dimensions Affect the Volume of a Slab?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abhay1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
abhay1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Fig.(1) shows a slab whose volume V is given by
V = xyz.
If the width, the length and the height of the slab, each increases by 1%, what is the
increase in its volume?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: partial differential equations

abhay said:
Fig.(1) shows a slab whose volume V is given by
V = xyz.
If the width, the length and the height of the slab, each increases by 1%, what is the
increase in its volume?
What figure?

I'm going guess that one corner of your slab is at the origin and everything is all nice and perpendicular.

So: [math]V_0 = xyz[/math] (Your original volume.)

Now, if we add 1% to x then we have x + 0.01x = 1.01x. Similar for the other dimensions. So [math]V = (1.01x)(1.01y)(1.01z) = (1.01)^3 xyz = (1.01)^3 V_0[/math]

What is the increase in volume here?

-Dan
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top