How Does a Coin Roll in a Circle Without Falling?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sam_Goldberg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Rolling
AI Thread Summary
A coin can roll in a circle without falling due to the combination of its tilt and friction. When the coin is tilted inward, the gravitational force acts downward while the normal force acts perpendicular to the surface, creating a net force that allows for circular motion. The friction between the coin and the table provides the necessary centripetal force to keep the coin moving in a circular path. As the coin rolls, its center of mass follows a linear trajectory, but the tilt and friction enable it to change direction. This mechanism allows the coin to maintain its circular motion without falling off.
Sam_Goldberg
Messages
46
Reaction score
1
Hi guys, I have an extremely simple conceptual question. According to my textbook (in a problem), "if you start a coin rolling on a table with care, you can make it roll in a circle... the coin leans inward, with its axis tilted." I ask: how is this possible? The center of mass of the coin undergoes circular motion, yet the only forces that will ever be on the coin is the weight and normal force, which can never point in the centripetal direction. Thus, where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, there has to be friction pointing inward. I got it.
 
Allow me to continue the question.
Why does it go in circles, and not fall (by tilting) while the CM's trajectory is linear
and in the the original direction?

in other words, what's the mechanism that makes the coin change it's direction or turn once it started tilting?

thanks
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top