How Does a Man Accelerate While Climbing a Rope?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of a man climbing a rope with acceleration, focusing on the forces involved, such as tension and friction, and the role of human physiology in this process. Participants explore the theoretical aspects of climbing, including free body diagrams and the nature of forces acting on the climber and the rope.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the man pulls the rope, creating tension (T) and static friction that helps him climb.
  • Others question whether the friction involved is static or kinetic, suggesting it must be static since the man's hand is not in motion relative to the rope.
  • Some participants express confusion about the role of gravity (g) and how it fits into the climbing scenario.
  • A few participants emphasize the importance of static friction in preventing slipping, while questioning what force results in upward acceleration.
  • There are discussions about the forces acting on a small section of the rope and the climber's hand, including weight, static friction, and tension.
  • Some participants argue that tension should not be counted as a force acting on the hand, while others suggest that tension and friction can be equated in certain contexts.
  • One participant raises the idea that no work is done between the climber's hand and the rope, proposing that work is done between different parts of the climber's arm.
  • Another participant suggests that the original question lacks clarity regarding its context and scope, questioning whether it is a homework problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the mechanics of climbing, with no consensus reached on the role of tension versus friction or the clarity of the original question. Multiple competing views remain regarding the forces involved and their interactions.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the definitions of forces involved, the assumptions made about the system, and the scope of the original question. Some participants note that the discussion could benefit from clearer context.

  • #31
That's why I thought it must be 2 phases with 2 acceleration and mass terms-- suppose the hands are different mass.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
metastable said:
That's why I thought it must be 2 phases with 2 acceleration and mass terms-- suppose the hands are different mass.
Suppose they are the same mass.
 
  • #33
Then one phase lifts the body mass minus the hand mass, and the other phase lifts only the hand mass. The body could be simplified to a telescoping rod with 2 grappling claws. During each phase only one claw is grasping.
 
  • #34
metastable said:
Then one phase lifts the body mass minus the hand mass, and the other phase lifts only the hand mass. The body could be simplified to a telescoping rod with 2 grappling claws. During each phase only one claw is grasping.
There is one phase where the right hand is grasping and the left hand is rising. There is another phase where the left hand is grasping and the right hand is rising. Both phases are identical. There is no reason to worry about the distinction.
 
  • #35
Kaushik said:
A man tries to climb up a rope with acceleration, ## a ##. What does he actually do to climb up?
Why make things simple? Let's assume that this man will not only "try" to accelerate up the rope, but is taking on this project with real dedication.

So he will needs to apply the ##F=m_m(g+a)## that I specified earlier. As long as his velocity is up, he is "climbing the rope". But the acceleration doesn't have to be positive. He could start on a trampoline and then grab onto the rope and start climbing with not enough force to maintain his climb. He would reach a maximum height, and then drop back down to the trampoline. If I were that man, I would go with this option.

But most of us probably envisioned this man starting at the bottom of the rope with ##V_0=0##. And by "climbing" we probably expect he will get at least a meter or two above the floor. We are also envisioning that the source of the mechanical energy is with the man - so something like a ski lift is out.

This arm movement stuff is also not going to cut it. I have tried climbing up a rope before. Doing it at all requires legs. Using arms to do it with constant velocity would be almost impossible. And doing it with constant acceleration is just not going to work.

He should use a space elevator - one where the "rope" stays in place and the gondola does the climbing. With nice computer controlled stepper motors, he will be able to control his acceleration precisely - and that nice constant acceleration is probably just what the elevator structure is best suited for. And of course, he will be able to maintain a constant acceleration for a much longer distance than most other methods - not just because of the length of the "rope", but because it will be extending into the vacuum of space where high velocities are better managed.

##F=(m_m+m_g)(g+a)##
##m_g##: mass of space gondola
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
824
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K