How does a pendulum clock keep time and why does it need to be wound up?

  • Thread starter Thread starter smashingtime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
A pendulum clock keeps time through the conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy, allowing it to swing continuously unless acted upon by friction or air resistance. On the moon, a pendulum would not stop immediately due to the lack of friction, but it would eventually lose energy to thermal energy, requiring winding to restore its potential energy. The need to wind a grandfather clock arises from energy loss due to friction at the anchor point and air resistance, which diminishes its swing over time. Rockets change direction in space by expelling gas through thrusters, utilizing the principle of conservation of momentum, where the action of gas ejection results in an equal and opposite reaction. Understanding these principles is essential for grasping the mechanics behind pendulum clocks and rocket propulsion.
smashingtime
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. A pendulum is set swining on the moon from a frictionless anchor point. Will it stop moving? Why or why not?
2. A grandfather clock has a swinging pendulum. Why does it need to be wound up every few days?
3. How can a rocket change the direction when it is far out in space in a vacuum? Include momentum, impulse, and force in your discussion.


2. The attempt at a solution
Well, I'm really lost but here goes--
1. According to Newton's First Law once a force is applied to an object it accelerates in the same direction and there's no gravity or friction to stop it?
2. No idea...
3. For every force, there is an equal and opposite force, so when a rocket takes off, it ejects a large amount of gas and creates a momentum upwards?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. The only force acting on it would be the force applied by the gravitational field of the moon, so i think it would stop but it would take a long time.
2. don't know anything about pendulum clocks, but you can google on how it works
3. if the rocket doesn't have propellers to accelerate it backwards, it can fire missiles - "For every force, there is an equal and opposite force"
 
1. I don't think it will stop moving. Once it has been set into motion, and someone has given it some potential energy, the pendulum will continue to change from potential energy to kinetic energy and back to potential energy. The gravitational field is what creates the potential energy. So given no sources of friction, it should continue to swing back and forth.
2. I'm guessing this has to do with the friction that exists. Air resistance and friction in the anchor point will slow it down, and the initial energy will be lost slowly to thermal energy. So you need to wind it up and give it back it's potential energy.
3. The rocket is far out in space, so they are not talking about when it launches. I think it has to do with releasing gas through thrusters, and since momentum has to be conserved, if you send gas particles in one direction, you will have a momentum in the other. My teacher told my class that if you were on a frozen lake, and ignoring all friction, if you spit, you will go in the other direction (very slowly, of course, but you will be moving in the opposite direction).
 
thanks guys! this has been so helpful :)
 
Battlecruiser said:
2. I'm guessing this has to do with the friction that exists. Air resistance and friction in the anchor point will slow it down, and the initial energy will be lost slowly to thermal energy. So you need to wind it up and give it back it's potential energy.

Well, one thing that normally that kind of clocks have is a weight that is attached to it with a rod. As long as the clock is moving, the weight is falling. So, you only need to put the weight back up. (once more, is giving him potential energy. But this way you only have to give him like 5-5 days...^_^)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top