How Does a Sound Meter Interpret Different Frequency Ranges?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fisico30
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Meter Sound Work
AI Thread Summary
A sound meter interprets different frequency ranges by applying filters that focus on specific components of the sound spectrum, resulting in varying dB readings. The dB (A) scale emphasizes frequencies that align with human hearing sensitivity, while the dB (C) scale captures lower frequencies, often resulting in higher readings for low-frequency sounds. When measuring sound, the total power can exceed the sum of the dB (A) and dB (C) readings, as these scales do not account for all frequency contributions equally. This discrepancy arises because the readings reflect different frequency sensitivities rather than a direct summation of sound pressure levels. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate sound measurement and interpretation.
fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
Hello Forum,

I am planning to buy a noise meter.
This instrument receives a signal that carries a certain total power. A spectrum analyzer tells us how this total power is distributed among the various frequency components.

When the sound meter gives a reading in the dB (A) scale it is practically applying a filter to that frequency spectrum and giving us the area (power) contained only in those frequencies. For example, if 100 dB SPL of sound hit the noise meter the reading will probably be less dB than 100 because the meter only cares about a certain frequency range...

dB (C) focuses on the low frequencies...

Question: If the meter is in front of a noise source, the dB reading on the dB (C) scale can be larger than the reading on the dB (A) scale. The dB(A) and dB(C) reading don't sum up to 100 dB SPL? why not? For instance, could it be that we read 60 dB(A) and 90 dB(C) even if the sound hitting the meter is 100 dB SPL...
Thanks,
fisico30
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It is basically a pressure measurement.

Sound power level ##P=20log(\frac{P}{P_{ref}})##

Where Pref is the reference or hearing threshold pressure.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top